From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: managing windows in two frames Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 18:23:46 +0200 Message-ID: <52260D12.4040002@gmx.at> References: <8561uiclrj.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <5225EF0F.1090109@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1378225452 4737 80.91.229.3 (3 Sep 2013 16:24:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 16:24:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stephen Leake , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 03 18:24:15 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VGtOp-0004jz-Eq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 18:24:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47422 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VGtOo-0007TN-Pc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 12:24:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56706) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VGtOf-0007T9-4a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 12:24:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VGtOX-0003Xf-QT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 12:24:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:57437) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VGtOX-0003Xa-I2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 12:23:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.47.44.219] ([62.47.44.219]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0Lxt3Q-1W2RZo04ai-015Jts for ; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 18:23:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:4kW25PRjQxIBJlxkGedS2dpTgfuAi2IInFW3iKX/NYAL11Hohdh Xu4Z2lYcs8DxetaP9tqrBBzro7XvSD9i52wmUZYhvJZYhjoQyOOtKDSASwf/cJ/j8xH7Rfg ZlEw8zcxVKuSOIhrnTUG8w2PxJ1i0s67jCYKjz0WnknvFvxck+FKiQv+pdIhEgjgUSTzuwM qxq5d0ZZiYXedTL2yKlWQ== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.15 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:163168 Archived-At: > Hmm... I misunderstood (and misused) it, then. How do I tell > display-buffer to not use another frame (I typically do that when > I want to make sure save-window-excursion will properly undo the > damage)? Add another entry, say `inhibit-other-frame'? But you should know better that using `save-window-excursion' around a `display-buffer' call is bad karma. A user can always request another frame. martin