From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: the state of the concurrency branch Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:05:01 -0700 Message-ID: <521CEA4D.9040900@cs.ucla.edu> References: <87vc2t7erx.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83txicffpe.fsf@gnu.org> <87haeb3lwp.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83mwo3f762.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1377626744 8977 80.91.229.3 (27 Aug 2013 18:05:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 18:05:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Tom Tromey , lekktu@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 27 20:05:43 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VENe9-0002JL-0L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 20:05:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57755 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VENe8-0006Al-I1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:05:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52811) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VENdw-0006AJ-D4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:05:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VENdm-0000pM-3c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:05:28 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.62]:42024) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VENde-0000cx-8x; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:05:10 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0D7D39E811D; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:05:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18qMUlVNIMZ1; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:05:02 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from penguin.cs.ucla.edu (Penguin.CS.UCLA.EDU [131.179.64.200]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3CFD439E8100; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:05:02 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 In-Reply-To: <83mwo3f762.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 131.179.128.62 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:163051 Archived-At: On 08/27/13 09:08, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > . Why is systhread.c on a separate file? Wouldn't it be better to > have this code in thread.c instead? It's not like thread.c can be > compiled in without also compiling systhread.c, right? Good point, and more generally, we should redo the code so that there's not a separate sys_* level above a pthread_ level, as the extra level's complexity isn't buying us anything. I'll work on a patch along those lines.