From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Current mode command discovery Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 04:26:34 +0200 Message-ID: <51e95567-7149-6d53-f339-932a39d9d5be@yandex.ru> References: <87v9aubm96.fsf@gnus.org> <878s7qifn2.fsf@telefonica.net> <874kieidcl.fsf@telefonica.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6233"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 To: Stefan Kangas , =?UTF-8?Q?=c3=93scar_Fuentes?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 15 03:27:28 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lBTbj-0001VN-WD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 03:27:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35800 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lBTbi-0004St-VA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 21:27:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58846) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lBTax-00040i-9g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 21:26:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-x32b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32b]:36158) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lBTaw-0006vf-0D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 21:26:39 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id h67so2035307wmh.1 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 18:26:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=g8chvYWuKDBWtTamlJtPRHK8LNyva/kDZjyNON8aR/c=; b=Wi3QV+bsJFx1jsCcrb9ZSAvVXmE4Sky2HeY6w+Ea6GeCNfPJCysuImyvzi2ncq1LMe uolqdMWIL32uIPixY7gVrmb8QRgCp3Kd5u5pNREjbBrjhjyTNRQ1/PMXyz6rE5QNj23t MNL+Q6DbtiTTWPyUGCnI/LERgP4g4prjcGwf3tgyog35+OE8Jcice4AbDEKwiFNGE2+q 250ydZNDP7ypXq9/21Ffiv2Qc4usGru3dT5FwkV+Sp0EwNPe/iCzrwWoWkvNIiiU/N3P 20VHh/T2sp2//p8uaNcudhtBs+fYwlgZyHFG1VeJ+1J/C6YWfo+WDpOwBujEFxBwf1qw TIMw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=g8chvYWuKDBWtTamlJtPRHK8LNyva/kDZjyNON8aR/c=; b=pExB25BxKAGVN+cY/4Ug+noZk8h31n0uIC7hqpnFwPfVKfpBKzvGt+1YQWvWAX/mFf 4F70lMgFTWHA3bazJZGPaepHrYn+1jqG2Fiow6uOTwSqSzwtv942+77VuAdVCOlMrgvM T+wSR065ifLQTSSmQjBEMnL7C6Bs0UEwyDq9ms9wuQB52GZzZ6tvZvWWW8cDM+Q3gJhh Ddzb+eDV3P2Yl6z1mOXWC2I7GJ29f2WPp/jSHDgWEvcu5WDrHLODtQDdV0EzrHZP4rOG TE+iiyAseBsrInCQuPjuncreOdk8DUKdY1hLnwKneYepU6BH4Q8wN640nxzUjDvJ1248 0x4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530opKe6qUn8s69sOwvFNm3aA7BcAi0sfju3tiYaim7WVylLr+yY 89vyOoS3QzO/JuWuM8OlR//IbxaCR6s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJytWMoKY2rV46NTGMi0va4p5+KhmMrhlaUpWuh0nnOGuRoz8yizHzBUl6jiEQwmgZIxmvbR4Q== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cbc2:: with SMTP id n2mr11972311wmi.34.1613355996583; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 18:26:36 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id m205sm22640075wmf.40.2021.02.14.18.26.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 14 Feb 2021 18:26:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::32b; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x32b.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -14 X-Spam_score: -1.5 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264820 Archived-At: On 15.02.2021 01:18, Stefan Kangas wrote: >> This will still result in an order of magnitude fewer annotations than >> doing them for each command. > Why do you think such annotations are a problem? Not so much for me, but people we complaining about "extra ceremony" and decided that the reduction in said ceremony was worth changing the 'interactive' in a backward-incompatible way.