From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: grischka Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Weird behavior and crash with X and TTY frame Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 17:02:07 +0200 Message-ID: <51618A6F.8030304@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1365346950 9474 80.91.229.3 (7 Apr 2013 15:02:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 15:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: jan.h.d@swipnet.se Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 07 17:02:33 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UOr6w-0002WD-Ug for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 17:02:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40470 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UOr6w-0002RR-Fu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 11:02:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36786) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UOr6q-0002RL-LZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 11:02:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UOr6o-00021M-6X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 11:02:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:62901) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UOr6n-000213-S5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 11:02:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.4]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MgJ3I-1UDOUb2sty-00NhrQ for ; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 17:02:15 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Apr 2013 15:02:15 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (EHLO [10.34.28.86]) [89.204.153.86] by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 07 Apr 2013 17:02:15 +0200 X-Authenticated: #18588216 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/F3i1cAnLF7qhR2MdDTqrSAGBsaiTUE3D81zY7Bu YgObmLNp/dqEi/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) Original-References: A0C28228-46D0-431B-A84F-77709146BB7E@swipnet.se X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.19 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158750 Archived-At: > This would be solvable if we had an independent Lisp loop per terminal, but it > is not so. > There is only one Lisp loop, shared by all frames/terminals, and if one > frame/terminal suspends the loop, it is suspended for all frames/terminals. Maybe you say "Lisp loop" because you think there can't be lisp without a loop. Thus you want to solve the problem with even more loops while the problem is actually caused by the loop that you already have. --- gr