From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_R=F6hler?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Copyright/Distribution questions (Emacs/Orgmode) Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:23:21 +0200 Message-ID: <515BF509.2040706@online.de> References: <87ober717z.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwu9iwcp.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwu9fiu0.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87d2v4f5bb.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87r4jjp2d2.fsf@yandex.ru> <8738vagciq.fsf@gmail.com> <87a9pgayzy.fsf@gmail.com> <87bo9wyr74.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87y5d0m3l3.fsf@gmail.com> <515BE920.1000503@online.de> <87obdwvw6v.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1364980927 6334 80.91.229.3 (3 Apr 2013 09:22:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 09:22:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Bastien , Jambunathan K To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 03 11:22:35 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UNJtr-0006Ou-2P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:22:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55241 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNJtS-0005M0-4p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 05:22:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50291) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNJtM-0005Lr-Ok for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 05:22:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNJtG-0004aH-Uf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 05:22:04 -0400 Original-Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:56679) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNJtG-0004a5-Lc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 05:21:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.21] (brln-4d0c1954.pool.mediaWays.net [77.12.25.84]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MPKwG-1UIu2O2ZdY-0053BR; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:21:57 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 In-Reply-To: <87obdwvw6v.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:yp30e6B5KZ1IsHHJdX9OJcQubme8bGJEAAVewhxd8E9 C9oi+jUmGqnXDSbKejzJldgcoYkodoLcCISh7+6geCAMs+ApVG PHU1Dd79O7y2/vj1qN6O8ruUZcyK6C1xymAj0eCooSsiHJkEQ2 zk3Rw0B79/YRJ/UrWTOYLlqrLj92dFOXj6EWAA3PF4mRQicCWz Rg6/TU7AWzYI4TlyYNcdaWBbAVeoybiX8ShTgO9fCUads6m/uP LdIwoE+jHJ54Aj3feBvC1un0OflA+qLjrV3gi70aIfYl+8mrLQ lOa8j7wokcnUpLGFiC/wK/qVLZMJ+dAX0lXNiT8csy8T3sL+Tz SuKEKGQT101Ehslq9Q3U= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.126.186 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158580 Archived-At: Am 03.04.2013 10:46, schrieb Bastien: > Andreas Röhler writes: > >> AFAIU the very reasons are beyond Emacs. > > Im my opinion, they are far below Emacs. > > One upset ego tries to inflate the personal issue at stake Hmm, always felt Emacs a very special community with a lot of strong personalities. Still like it :) and > to make everyone believes there is a legal issue while there is > none. > Wherefrom the eagerness to remove Jambus's code then? Seems more people believe that, even if it's wrong wrt GPL. Beyond GPL, only FSF-clerk knows the conditions of the very assignment. That's the point where a kind of power-process starts, what's recognised so far... Cheers