From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/emacs-24 r111116: eval-after-load fix Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 09:34:10 +0400 Message-ID: <50E669D2.6030808@yandex.ru> References: <878v8b839k.fsf@yandex.ru> <871ue3c5ek.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1357277659 9509 80.91.229.3 (4 Jan 2013 05:34:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 05:34:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 04 06:34:36 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TqzvQ-0006RC-0s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 06:34:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37414 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TqzvA-0006jh-Rj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:34:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35090) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tqzv5-0006jZ-I4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:34:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tqzv1-0005MP-Oy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:34:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-la0-f47.google.com ([209.85.215.47]:34508) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tqzuw-0005LQ-PD; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:34:06 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id fh20so9183092lab.34 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:34:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vtITvZdxx3lwbjoP+IKXRJz1tyRM/nzny+nDHvPfVW4=; b=ZZ10kanM7LvF8OLMZRWBolf8rOV7e0tPHPFD7OB804tBFMYCoHqwYIR+7W247Aq9ty bOp7VZvhwd+JwPsOcGDk2b0eb2qeUd4zTFeXh1buW6djdLhfVdHt+Fk7E/mdJUAWS4q5 zjloTGFHDAnoG3T7X5G3pOe1W3giup+vew2+ZbqOHNrGqFMsVSkKpsEiK6eneS2V9InK tEmWNoyxzZB9kEiAXRi8YxJZtvup+8p/4PWTyll1x5bxoGUXwAgGqt5G4aP/qyvjH3h2 JDIYkcJV2dIF75G6h9EI9ZWzMq+7OhrP6kIbLPpr0zqnDhRvnvRME89TSiCXT7C5xonI JOYw== X-Received: by 10.152.144.71 with SMTP id sk7mr48766867lab.29.1357277645503; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:34:05 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([178.252.98.87]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ne2sm19064426lab.10.2013.01.03.21.34.03 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:34:04 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 In-Reply-To: <871ue3c5ek.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.215.47 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:156071 Archived-At: On 03.01.2013 7:27, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Glenn Morris writes: > > > Maybe. (Personally, I doubt any of these purecopy calls have any > > non-negligible effect.) > > FWIW, XEmacs did away with purespace ages ago with no complaints from > anybody. (We still have `purecopy' for API compatibility with Emacs, > but it's a no-op now.) > > That's damning with faint praise, of course, but it's a data point. Is it really faint, though? If the removal of purespace brought no slowdown, why keep it in GNU Emacs?