From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Colascione Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: why bugs only fixed in trunk? Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 17:44:46 -0800 Message-ID: <50DA568E.4080505@dancol.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig72120A04248B2F2E206A5A8B" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1356486310 6989 80.91.229.3 (26 Dec 2012 01:45:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 01:45:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 26 02:45:25 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tng3a-0006f2-0o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 02:45:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51542 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tng3L-000884-OB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 20:45:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45747) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tng3I-00085s-Uy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 20:45:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tng3G-0002GZ-Mq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 20:45:00 -0500 Original-Received: from dancol.org ([2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3]:38210) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tng3G-0002Ey-HO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 20:44:58 -0500 Original-Received: from c-76-22-66-162.hsd1.wa.comcast.net ([76.22.66.162] helo=[0.0.0.0]) by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tng38-00066H-N2; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 17:44:50 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155883 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig72120A04248B2F2E206A5A8B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/25/2012 5:19 PM, Leo wrote: > One of the incentives to report bugs in the pretest is to have them > squashed before the release. Unfortunately it seems most bugs are just > fixed in trunk (which could mean wait another year for the fix) even if= > reported against a pretest build. >=20 > Is there an implicitly agreed practice here? The trunk is in stabalization mode right now: only critical bugfixes and regressions can go in. The sooner we get 24.3 out the door, the sooner we= can release a 24.4 with all the bugfixes you mention. --------------enig72120A04248B2F2E206A5A8B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDaVpEACgkQ17c2LVA10VsXTwCgsQsVNH8UopTKeUXXM9QXSu89 vpsAoK0e9vV8fdidBqNF1GxmW7+P7kLg =uNP9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig72120A04248B2F2E206A5A8B--