From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r111061: Fix for bad test in ruby-mode-tests.el. Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 10:41:11 +0100 Message-ID: <50BF16B7.8070608@gmx.at> References: <878v9groov.fsf@yandex.ru> <87ehj7hiy7.fsf@gnu.org> <50BCF33B.4080809@yandex.ru> <85vccitddw.fsf@member.fsf.org> <50BE3903.8000507@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1354700485 23635 80.91.229.3 (5 Dec 2012 09:41:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 09:41:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stephen Leake , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 05 10:41:38 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TgBTx-00063x-9H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 10:41:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57320 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TgBTl-0008MG-9m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 04:41:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57066) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TgBTh-0008M8-Fg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 04:41:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TgBTg-00006h-Cw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 04:41:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:40480) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TgBTg-00006T-2J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 04:41:16 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 05 Dec 2012 09:41:14 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-60-75.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.60.75]) [62.47.60.75] by mail.gmx.net (mp070) with SMTP; 05 Dec 2012 10:41:14 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+hc14CYdGhK3AcQ1d6DFIeINkRhYADM9q7Z45CFm wuil0xnLXHbtNP In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 213.165.64.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155286 Archived-At: > AFAIK indent-sexp won't touch a line that's already properly indented, > so TABs will only be changed to spaces (or vice versa) if you do > fix the indentation, which is OK. Right. But if you, say, introduce a new let binding somewhere at the beginning of a defun and later on decide that you don't need it but do want to keep other changes you made in between, reindenting will leave whitespace changes in the new code. martin