From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r111061: Fix for bad test in ruby-mode-tests.el. Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 00:00:15 +0400 Message-ID: <50BD04CF.9030508@yandex.ru> References: <878v9groov.fsf@yandex.ru> <87ehj7hiy7.fsf@gnu.org> <50BCF33B.4080809@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1354564829 24970 80.91.229.3 (3 Dec 2012 20:00:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 20:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 03 21:00:41 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TfcC0-000868-6b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 21:00:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58809 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfcBo-0005so-Fq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 15:00:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60377) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfcBh-0005Zq-0e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 15:00:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfcBg-0002A1-1t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 15:00:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-f169.google.com ([209.85.217.169]:53521) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfcBe-00029b-7M; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 15:00:18 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id gk1so2899753lbb.0 for ; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:00:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BuqLNrWqX/LXLExRM4Lad37No6fPr92zUvrT6mR/d5A=; b=ubfB0Tg6f1iwpeZ3rGmtoGW3AoN3LHH60peo78leC2HE4w97a0BhHBshExVN+HX1Zw cD5fCEWeX0HJdddULgthrZbi5OwjaOxnQ0pqVQu1GHvTaa8ML8/xTspbqpEc88olN+P7 UkuJfberecLWIAsI+0qq2k0cx3DuK12kZBAWgPVe9V6qkTbPCi0Rb6ZntUdapcGYJlK8 GSpVagIUerd9l+RT74/WWVL7RyBBLTdvT/fHlzvjDFLouLvyIZeQP2f6N8YskY04PJFc Xjzi2GKnWywpkNaAOGa2TnRMXSyabmE83OH2SuhpMMq/sdtr6SVRCNvlUGBUVY38jwbE ZoNA== Original-Received: by 10.152.105.33 with SMTP id gj1mr10594276lab.49.1354564816753; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:00:16 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.5] ([178.252.98.87]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p5sm5890339lbh.2.2012.12.03.12.00.13 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:00:14 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.217.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155213 Archived-At: On 03.12.2012 23:48, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> What about the third question? Last time I've seen a discussion about >> whitespace style in Emacs codebase, I think it was somewhat of a consensus >> that spaces > tabs (which is also my preference), but doing whitespace-only >> commits was declared verboten, so I can't just revert that part of >> the change. > > There are better things to do in life than worry about how the > whitespace you don't see is represented internally, Sure, there are. But I do see it, courtesy of whitespace-mode. --Dmitry