From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miguel Guedes Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Feature request: other-previous-window Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 15:44:27 +0000 Message-ID: <50ABA55B.30405@gmail.com> References: <50AB9F22.4060200@gmail.com> <50ABA135.3050406@lanl.gov> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1353426286 28022 80.91.229.3 (20 Nov 2012 15:44:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 15:44:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Davis Herring Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 20 16:44:57 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Taq0M-0002X5-Bw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:44:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33527 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Taq0C-0007ut-40 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:44:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59433) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Taq05-0007nB-1f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:44:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Taq01-0003Gw-2T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:44:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:44281) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Taq00-0003Fu-Qn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:44:32 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id m15so3198101lah.0 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 07:44:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EWlNdiWd96L+8pssLv2KO/k9/SzgLb2srOJ3+HwYe5k=; b=OKpH38WJK8OV3sEmjbHkCfXLa2Dj3uJ8sjGx9v9dSbTR6hoOrimipJ+Gbn3Oc7CDFu G+UZc8tHDK6btAKEobyLZ/3wRERH9T1AMLH66p/UME3vU5JJga9JV1Jhq4ANH+jyMJUj u6fBN+TP7vi4pEoN7IsTMng7X9/zJpvTNZS6loAdLdMaLQ97Mu++mLXFJQG2fqRJTPWg qKt+7cMMk5b6BG+2syOuHaf2Wj0HJPQeIL9ak9KByaHHOtQBzfHjgYWNZMSvuR8bwKWg 1MuBzKzJoy3cvkAypiqsEwXv80qngd4D4Sy5ju419z53y4y1f1A/GC+TWQ/fOT3MUhMN 9x4Q== Original-Received: by 10.112.83.71 with SMTP id o7mr6270242lby.60.1353426271735; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 07:44:31 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.2] (02dc0849.bb.sky.com. [2.220.8.73]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g3sm4580766lbm.15.2012.11.20.07.44.28 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 20 Nov 2012 07:44:30 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121028 Thunderbird/16.0.2 In-Reply-To: <50ABA135.3050406@lanl.gov> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.215.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:154989 Archived-At: On 20/11/12 15:26, Davis Herring wrote: >> This is a request proposal for a very simple feature: the twin brother >> of other-window. > > What about C-- C-x o? (Or C-u - C-x o, etc.) > It just seemed to me overly complicated for such a simple task. Why should the inverse of C-x o require twice as effort, when the effort required should (IMHO) be exactly the same only having the inverse result? -- Miguel