On 11/08/2012 06:45 PM, Dmitry Antipov wrote:

> On 11/08/2012 06:03 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
>>> struct Lisp_Vector
>>>    {
>>>       struct vectorlike_header header;
>>>       union
>>>         {
>>>            Lisp_Object contents[1];
>>>            struct Lisp_Vector *next;
>>>         } u;
>>>    };
>>
>> Yes, that'd be better.
>
> This will be a quite large patch, with a lot of small changes,
> and I don't want to mix them with the core logical changes.
> So if others votes for such a change, I would rather like to
> do it separately.

Argh, there is another solution (comes into my head immediately
after commit, of course).

Dmitry