From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christoph Scholtes Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Windows: Emacs 24.1 binary size vs 24.2 binary size Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2012 07:33:49 -0600 Message-ID: <504B493D.9080704@gmail.com> References: <503D7C5B.4080701@gmail.com> <504219DA.20309@gmail.com> <83pq65g5lx.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1347111239 17885 80.91.229.3 (8 Sep 2012 13:33:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 13:33:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D3scar_Fuentes?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 08 15:34:01 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TALAf-0004il-GN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 15:34:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36684 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TALAc-0003FG-9g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 09:33:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44853) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TALAZ-0003F7-Cp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 09:33:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TALAX-0002xC-65 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 09:33:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-iy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169]:57448) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TALAV-0002vS-KQ; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 09:33:51 -0400 Original-Received: by iagk10 with SMTP id k10so466671iag.0 for ; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 06:33:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iGWdJQeQ0UA0PbpL4jlhh5+Kcq0uSUXdXvOyrvuuM34=; b=pkTiYZ+3mWg8OpGSofP5ZSnLXBTagT6fbTGouibXdP4t3qel4+dnxN1n7Bbvk14sRj gobZ2HWP7/aJ4Eg7yY/2YkqzfwptJoJcNu3iD/iEUTcNb0UgHm56vJAA+pT58cSWcFEa RxZcW6MvrYeQwV/lYfTQi4SyvVo1cg/6HvUEtQ4/RodAec+7ubFOJBvHf0dULKu7L/Yg iKBCFIzE2dVGWG/SHhTtVlO0lw9xdnlS+tOh4ay87diudo3dvSi4M/BZb8LqOMaEsXLF blgw3WRk9uwajFGUgCbLVyQ+mmJw83hRgHem1pHSJ1xVA+YFMu0/qwLqIoZsIc/32u52 fVSw== Original-Received: by 10.50.188.129 with SMTP id ga1mr1808513igc.6.1347111230952; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 06:33:50 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.3] (75-166-145-199.hlrn.qwest.net. [75.166.145.199]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id nh1sm2756918igc.11.2012.09.08.06.33.49 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 08 Sep 2012 06:33:50 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 In-Reply-To: <83pq65g5lx.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.210.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153173 Archived-At: On 9/1/2012 8:50 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I don't have a stripped binary to compare with your numbers. I do see > a similar decrease in the size of the un-stripped emacs.exe, but I > cannot find any explanation for that. The size of temacs.exe is > almost identical between the 2 versions, which seems to point to Lisp, > or to data structures built by Emacs during loadup/dump process. > However, loadup.el saw no changes between the 2 versions, and > loaddefs.el is identical modulo time stamps of the files it records. > And I cannot spot anything pertinent, neither in src/ChangeLog nor in > lisp/ChangeLog. Thanks. I will try Oscar's suggestion and bisect just to be sure. Christoph