From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r109864: Fix minor problems found by static checking. Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 12:37:12 -0700 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <504506E8.5070506@cs.ucla.edu> References: <83392zf7bu.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1346701047 11156 80.91.229.3 (3 Sep 2012 19:37:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 19:37:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 03 21:37:29 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T8cSe-0003n5-Gx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:37:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41625 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T8cSb-00082e-J0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 15:37:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43538) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T8cSV-00082L-O0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 15:37:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T8cSU-0002Zp-Te for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 15:37:19 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.62]:48636) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T8cSQ-0002Ya-5r; Mon, 03 Sep 2012 15:37:14 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 524AB39E8015; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:37:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Of5XPz1E7Iha; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:37:11 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-108-23-119-2.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [108.23.119.2]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44C2639E8008; Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:37:11 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0 In-Reply-To: <83392zf7bu.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 131.179.128.62 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:152970 Archived-At: On 09/03/2012 08:35 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > What problems did static checking find in this (and other similar) > fragment? It didn't find any problems in those two cases, as near as I can tell; it was a false alarm by the new GCC flag -Wjump-misses-init. Since those fragments annoy, I reverted them and instead changed configure.ac to not use that GCC flag.