From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christoph Scholtes Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Windows: Emacs 24.1 binary size vs 24.2 binary size Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 08:21:14 -0600 Message-ID: <504219DA.20309@gmail.com> References: <503D7C5B.4080701@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1346509286 759 80.91.229.3 (1 Sep 2012 14:21:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 14:21:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii To: Emacs-Devel devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 01 16:21:27 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T7oZf-0001dM-Si for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 16:21:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60871 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T7oZd-0004cg-2W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 10:21:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47661) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T7oZa-0004cb-Et for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 10:21:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T7oZZ-0004Pw-EV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 10:21:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-iy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169]:36101) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T7oZZ-0004Pp-95; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 10:21:17 -0400 Original-Received: by iagk10 with SMTP id k10so7126273iag.0 for ; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 07:21:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=A06+8bmnepjT5qQz594u/yxmjEuWByZmeIdHTxE5eTc=; b=w+DVj8WAFQlkS9lA4HGXJxtqwHbWLGreMM8NPNkC4aLspIzrcMAAMjybvfT18yXp63 MAMVHTHk/MfrxZMmLD7q0FBn8XWqCjzDIscHNOtjmR4LsXMZFAvPWRVZfa4CBj1AEPRO IZVMFijUujyu9QZ9u5LKA7jzeANzQAJm299D4UCN1+K5Wc56QwkT9Br5c6F95NlhtjiE Xq3IQMyy7wU7CNLWxCasWp6FvN3HvPTX7wQ8w6gT+ISlD7RwBtmAWMaShvLy3Vm9KJQh 90/41By80Pf40Sb3rkWIAyot4OYq6K2O/WK+UmEVtTr2VimGHFPCVYqD+A7ImF+dvhkX TwXA== Original-Received: by 10.50.34.169 with SMTP id a9mr6224522igj.13.1346509276262; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 07:21:16 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.7] (75-166-156-251.hlrn.qwest.net. [75.166.156.251]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d4sm7492954iga.14.2012.09.01.07.21.14 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 01 Sep 2012 07:21:15 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 In-Reply-To: <503D7C5B.4080701@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.210.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:152931 Archived-At: On 8/28/2012 8:20 PM, Christoph Scholtes wrote: > I just built the latest 24.2 release on Windows and I noticed a > significant difference in the binary size of emacs.exe between version > 24.1 and 24.2. Was there any change that would explain the difference? > > emacs.exe (24.1): 11,343,408 bytes > emacs.exe (24.2): 9,881,136 bytes > > Both versions were compiled with gcc 4.6.2 I'd like to have an answer just in case anybody else notices after I upload the release build. Any ideas?