From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emilio Lopes Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: patch for woman (woman-topic-at-point) Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 18:13:51 +0200 Organization: private Message-ID: <4yd5nvpfls.fsf@tiscali.de> References: <85d5nxx3ax.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1125509118 6791 80.91.229.2 (31 Aug 2005 17:25:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 17:25:18 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 31 19:25:16 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EAWJ0-0002O4-4Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:23:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EAWJn-0008BE-Lq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 13:24:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EAWJ1-00088p-WB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 13:23:24 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EAWIx-00086f-A1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 13:23:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EAWIw-00085c-Vw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 13:23:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1EAWDU-0001i6-7n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 13:17:40 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EAW8r-0007Pz-3C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:12:53 +0200 Original-Received: from p62.246.50.107.tisdip.tiscali.de ([62.246.50.107]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:12:53 +0200 Original-Received: from eclig by p62.246.50.107.tisdip.tiscali.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:12:53 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 8 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p62.246.50.107.tisdip.tiscali.de User-Agent: Emacs Gnus Cancel-Lock: sha1:mS0AGy59kGgn2lN67Zg1SQFWsm4= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:42534 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: > Why don't we let `test-completion' return the completion (string) > argument, whenever the return value is non-nil? I could imagine this is for consistency with `try-completion', which returns a string with the longest string common to all matches or t if the given string was already an exact match.