Re: meta-{next, previous}-error

[Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>]

On 12 Apr 2006, larsi@quimbies.gnus.org wrote:

> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
>
>> Level Command             Implemented?
>>
>> -M    meta-previous-error N (e.g. diff-file-prev)
>> -1    previous-error      Y
>> +1    next-error          Y
>> +M    meta-next-error     N (e.g. diff-file-next)
>>
>> (remember that *-error map to *-locus and *-match, so it's not only
>> about errors)
>
> It makes sense to me.
>
> Now, `next-error' and `previous-error' are bound to `M-g n' and `M-g
> p', as well as `M-g M-n' and `M-g M-p', so how about `M-g M-f' and
> `M-g M-b' for the "higher level" commands?  (Forwards, backward.)
> `M-g M-f' is quote easy to type...

Sure.  Any other comments before I produce a patch for simple.el?  It
will work like next-error: if the function is bound in the buffer it
will get called, so the mode just needs to bind the symbol to the
appropiate function.  I'll do the diff-mode example Stefan showed.

Thanks
Ted