From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: next-error-last-buffer Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 12:18:52 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <4n8yezqr2r.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <871xluig40.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87u0y6jjq9.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4nwu31j4ff.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87zn7wgtel.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4nu0y0ef4z.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87n03sfd1x.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4nd64ndhdt.fsf@lifelogs.com> <4nllj76uqz.fsf@lifelogs.com> <4n8yf76u05.fsf@lifelogs.com> <4nbrk0651p.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1086626285 10388 80.91.224.253 (7 Jun 2004 16:38:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 16:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 07 18:37:55 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BXN8F-0005hY-00 for ; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 18:37:55 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BXN8F-00073M-00 for ; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 18:37:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BXN8m-00012C-TD for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 12:38:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BXN8g-00011S-JV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 12:38:22 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BXN8f-00010q-0P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 12:38:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BXN8e-00010m-UO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 12:38:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.224.249] (helo=main.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BXN78-0003SE-Dd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 12:36:46 -0400 Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BXN77-0007Xh-00 for ; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 18:36:45 +0200 Original-Received: from asimov.bwh.harvard.edu ([134.174.9.63]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 18:36:45 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by asimov.bwh.harvard.edu with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 18:36:45 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 23 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: asimov.bwh.harvard.edu X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:vdUTLMPu+nb7E34qEaNelTUuxIc= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:24676 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:24676 On Thu, 03 Jun 2004, rms@gnu.org wrote: > The only docs for next-error are in the function declaration; I fixed > those and the new patch is attached. > > I am sure next-error is documented in the Emacs Manual. OK, I found it. The current docs are correct regarding compilation-minor-mode, but they say nothing about the selection of the buffer. > I think we need to document that in the Emacs Manual. We also need > to update the parts about Occur. I understand. The compilation-minor-mode discussion, however, is not the place for the occur next-error discussion. Because of the way next-error crosses modes right now, it may be better off in its own section, referenced by the compilation-minor-mode and occur sections. This depends on how RMS and others feel about my proposal for making next-error a next-DWIM interface; if next-error stays limited then it may not deserve its own section so much. Ted