From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta Subject: Re: Emacs setup assistants Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 10:10:36 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <4n1xl9kjab.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87zn847n6a.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <1438-Thu20May2004203119+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <4nd64y29zc.fsf@lifelogs.com> <2719-Fri21May2004201241+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <4nn041u050.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1085424464 9912 80.91.224.253 (24 May 2004 18:47:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 18:47:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon May 24 20:47:39 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BSKU7-000697-00 for ; Mon, 24 May 2004 20:47:39 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BSKU6-0000Rj-00 for ; Mon, 24 May 2004 20:47:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BSK8S-0006t5-GL for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 24 May 2004 14:25:16 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BSJaQ-0001Pl-Vi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2004 13:50:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BSJ2W-0003ld-Tm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2004 13:15:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.41.8] (helo=mx20.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1BSIme-00014I-FK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2004 12:58:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.224.249] (helo=main.gmane.org) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BSGe9-00059m-TV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2004 10:41:50 -0400 Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BSGQN-0001kU-00 for ; Mon, 24 May 2004 16:27:31 +0200 Original-Received: from asimov.bwh.harvard.edu ([134.174.9.63]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 24 May 2004 16:27:31 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by asimov.bwh.harvard.edu with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 24 May 2004 16:27:31 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 27 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: asimov.bwh.harvard.edu X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:111udgz/6OU4DdvmCFwpygkP2hg= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:23897 gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta:14815 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:23897 On Sat, 22 May 2004, abraham@dina.kvl.dk wrote: > Ted Zlatanov writes: >> Cancel, Next, Previous. > > Actually, if the process is linear, I think most users would be happy > with an non-introcive outline of the process available somewhere. > Something like: > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > | Gnus setup: 3.1 News host > 1. Introcution | > 2. Identity | What is the name of your news (nntp) host > 3. Servers | > * 3.1 News host | _________________ > 3.2 Reading mail | > 3.3 Sending mail | > 4. Whatever | [Previous] [Cancel] [Next] > 6. The End | > --------------------------------------------------------------- I think that's reasonable. I don't want users to *jump* to 3.3 or 2 from 3.1, that's the major issue I'm raising. Thanks Ted