From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Perry E. Metzger" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Native compiler - passing command line options to C compiler Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 11:10:36 -0400 Message-ID: <4c6a0d02-a6db-f92d-7c45-a10c3052bc99@piermont.com> References: <83bl5fkvky.fsf@gnu.org> <87lf4gqr3q.fsf@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6078"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:92.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/92.0 To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 01 17:11:40 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLRts-0001Sf-DR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 17:11:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59924 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLRtq-0008V8-Bx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 11:11:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47638) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLRst-0007W5-WE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 11:10:40 -0400 Original-Received: from hacklheber.piermont.com ([166.84.7.14]:55786) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLRss-0006Nt-Fm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 11:10:39 -0400 Original-Received: from snark.cb.piermont.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hacklheber.piermont.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F0571CC for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 11:10:36 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from [10.160.2.107] (jabberwock.cb.piermont.com [10.160.2.107]) by snark.cb.piermont.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E82D2DECC4 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 11:10:36 -0400 (EDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <87lf4gqr3q.fsf@linaro.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=166.84.7.14; envelope-from=perry@piermont.com; helo=hacklheber.piermont.com X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.029, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:273666 Archived-At: On 9/1/21 10:58, Alex Bennée wrote: > > Shouldn't we be ensuring -march=native for all JIT code anyway? Are the > native eln files ever considered portable/packagable or will they always > be a product of the users current system? > I believe the emacs binary itself contains native code in the new way of doing things, though I believe most eln files are considered user specific. Perry