From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Antipov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Aligned blocks management: obsolete? Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 07:30:49 +0400 Message-ID: <4FE29569.6000302@yandex.ru> References: <4EE5B744.1090103@yandex.ru> <4EE60A93.9060401@yandex.ru> <4EE6478C.1020701@cs.ucla.edu> <4FE0ADFC.9090504@yandex.ru> <4FE171EC.8000503@yandex.ru> <83wr31diaj.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1340249461 17939 80.91.229.3 (21 Jun 2012 03:31:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 03:31:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 21 05:30:59 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ShY6k-0001Et-Cz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 05:30:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37307 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ShY6k-0002ol-Cm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 23:30:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33168) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ShY6h-0002oQ-9z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 23:30:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ShY6f-0007o9-NW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 23:30:54 -0400 Original-Received: from forward11.mail.yandex.net ([95.108.130.93]:41953) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ShY6c-0007no-UQ; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 23:30:51 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp13.mail.yandex.net (smtp13.mail.yandex.net [95.108.130.68]) by forward11.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id B2813E89395; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 07:30:48 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1340249448; bh=w3EsVoB2LI61ZKjK7FApnNweIRI0EjTiSRuLoaI+MWE=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=a2F0BYlH5jVNuLjAC2W9D36rSesIkWAuHXrEzUaa4Mse80rY6GRsCyigla4EKLEJu U5je8h7OBfj4WVYfDQiNj1t/PHKRGaon80X/LExiCvbjOWWn5z4xME11YaHjOYNxj9 hzESjC6fVcXQmB/hzfafT2JCwtkeVur/6GGor38A= Original-Received: from smtp13.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp13.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 9168BE405E4; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 07:30:48 +0400 (MSK) Original-Received: from 213-148-21-55.gelicon.ru (213-148-21-55.gelicon.ru [213.148.21.55]) by smtp13.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id Um9aVobA-Um9iuhwi; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 07:30:48 +0400 X-Yandex-Rcpt-Suid: eliz@gnu.org X-Yandex-Rcpt-Suid: emacs-devel@gnu.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1340249448; bh=w3EsVoB2LI61ZKjK7FApnNweIRI0EjTiSRuLoaI+MWE=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Z6xFwSp6h9YwDN9nA03KAO83bQI+gzwu9ipNpar1vQaDFaQscU6Uz4xGbnuyb/oYz nKxYvvuBJIKCNUtW76f7VUN3yF1D0alVR02xDNbZNqgE3WCHMZ9JU+SeN7ZVKXRAKO SujaS0vMWdj9Fjz8XxLDv2aoy0bmbxbD9iwzAfwM= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 In-Reply-To: <83wr31diaj.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 95.108.130.93 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151066 Archived-At: On 06/20/2012 09:06 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > So, unless I'm missing something, the MS-Windows build (and also the > MS-DOS one) should defined HAVE_POSIX_MEMALIGN and use its > implementation provided by gmalloc.c. Unless, that is, you think that > gmalloc's implementation of posix_memalign is not good enough, in > which case we will be much better off improving it than switching to > MS's malloc. Oops, I was pretty sure that native MSVC build uses MS malloc :-(. BTW, is it possible to cross-compile Emacs for MS-Windows with mingw? Dmitry