From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Antipov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Aligned blocks management: obsolete? Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 07:12:38 +0400 Message-ID: <4FE29126.6020803@yandex.ru> References: <4EE5B744.1090103@yandex.ru> <4EE60A93.9060401@yandex.ru> <4EE6478C.1020701@cs.ucla.edu> <4FE0ADFC.9090504@yandex.ru> <4FE171EC.8000503@yandex.ru> <85a9zxoo6x.fsf@iznogoud.viz> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1340248374 11938 80.91.229.3 (21 Jun 2012 03:12:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 03:12:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs development discussions To: Wolfgang Jenkner Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 21 05:12:53 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ShXp8-0006U4-Al for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 05:12:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57304 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ShXp8-00064m-4s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 23:12:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54169) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ShXp4-00064J-TG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 23:12:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ShXp3-00031x-58 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 23:12:42 -0400 Original-Received: from forward17.mail.yandex.net ([95.108.253.142]:48427) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ShXp2-00031Z-Mo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 23:12:41 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp16.mail.yandex.net (smtp16.mail.yandex.net [95.108.252.16]) by forward17.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id E10521062D26; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 07:12:37 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1340248357; bh=qDN7pl2yOI11coWZPj9152dFPRNbs9pDJ5jhvDKT9LA=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=NcVXezQzvmCCWLvGv8y3bEaQpPyhvrVd5nmuPPqWQS4g1E5MUEqhJ+EG10+lAIrt2 S+/SG+heZ/A34AsLYJ8ICd8ckOLks+SvFNAnAhbDKex0jDJtEa5eMzm6i4Iz4UY2ya tevRxbzbevlk79Ta/sKM/kBfDA7v7q7Iko0DNIGM= Original-Received: from smtp16.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp16.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id C00636A0754; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 07:12:37 +0400 (MSK) Original-Received: from 213-148-21-55.gelicon.ru (213-148-21-55.gelicon.ru [213.148.21.55]) by smtp16.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id CbgqETZ5-CbgSv3g1; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 07:12:37 +0400 X-Yandex-Rcpt-Suid: wjenkner@inode.at X-Yandex-Rcpt-Suid: emacs-devel@gnu.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1340248357; bh=qDN7pl2yOI11coWZPj9152dFPRNbs9pDJ5jhvDKT9LA=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=jl1JGAc8ZDm8PKeSvg3N3GA7qaiMBUJNq7edODD8/9FkShAo5DaEJWqdDZ07rctii t3SmOJxVvfZb8Ppdh54R0gmJ7BLXHmLfhSIrMt7Q2laxEOMxRS5i3m1yOgYdKqRSRv DTc6JNwRgVZ1vXqnKqsUF/wLW6p82+w3mIBhJh6o= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 In-Reply-To: <85a9zxoo6x.fsf@iznogoud.viz> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 95.108.253.142 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151065 Archived-At: On 06/20/2012 09:59 PM, Wolfgang Jenkner wrote: > I think the following trivial fix is needed (relative to your patch): Argh, sure. Thanks. Dmitry