From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Jean-Christophe Helary Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "Why is emacs so square?" Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 08:24:57 +0900 Message-ID: <4F7BFDA4-D9F6-42E3-A7B6-ED8397DC8B6D@traduction-libre.org> References: <863691n4xl.wl-me@enzu.ru> <86blno9yle.wl-me@enzu.ru> <87d0845msg.fsf@yahoo.com> <87h7xgjasw.fsf@yahoo.com> <875zdwjais.fsf@yahoo.com> <6a198677-41b6-4dbd-39d0-2b01550d53cf@yandex.ru> <32f6a2ce-e30f-059f-dcd4-233d666a10a1@yandex.ru> <87tuzqmskt.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87a71hv584.fsf@logand.com> <87k10jerlv.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87pnaa1p9r.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="115882"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Richard Stallman , Steinar Bang , Tomas Hlavaty , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , Arthur Miller To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 08 01:26:49 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ji4gj-000U46-0x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 01:26:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58584 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ji4gi-00005f-31 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 19:26:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53012) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ji4gC-000872-KO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 19:26:16 -0400 Original-Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.200]:35883) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ji4g8-000273-68; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 19:26:16 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 111.89.103.91 Original-Received: from [10.0.1.13] (pl22363.ag1313.nttpc.ne.jp [111.89.103.91]) (Authenticated sender: jean.christophe.helary@traduction-libre.org) by relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 649AC20002; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 23:26:02 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87pnaa1p9r.fsf@mail.linkov.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.200; envelope-from=jean.christophe.helary@traduction-libre.org; helo=relay7-d.mail.gandi.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/07 18:57:21 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:252033 Archived-At: > On Jun 8, 2020, at 7:31, Juri Linkov wrote: >=20 >>> BTW, why browse-url.el still doesn't support the Brave web browser? >>=20 >> I know nothing about Brave, but I'm wondering instead why it is that >> browse-url.el would need special support for specific browsers. >> Can't it just run "the" browser, whichever it is? >=20 > There is a lot of cruft accumulated in browse-url.el mostly for old = browsers > with different handling of command line arguments for = "new-window-is-tab" logic. > But it seems nowadays only three options should be sufficient: >=20 > - use the default browser found by browse-url-default-browser; > - or use Emacs browser eww; > - or allow to specify a browser program name with additional = arguments. That makes sense. --=20 Jean-Christophe Helary @brandelune http://mac4translators.blogspot.com