emacs-20111206-r106632 Windows Binaries

emacs-20111206-r106632 Windows Binaries

[Christoph Scholtes]

The Emacs Trunk Windows Binaries (bzr revno 106632) have been published in

http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows/

The binaries were built using the following libraries:
giflib-4.1.4-1
gnutls-2.10.1
jpeg-6b-4
libXpm-3.5.8
libpng-1.4.3-1
tiff-3.8.2-1
zlib-1.2.5-2

Please report any bugs that you come across via M-x report-emacs-bugs,
or email bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org.

Note, that in order to support potential debugging of this build a 
.gdbinit file has been added to the root directory of the distribution.

For questions, email emacs-devel@gnu.org.

Re: emacs-20111206-r106632 Windows Binaries

[cg]

On 12/7/2011 11:27 AM, Christoph Scholtes wrote:
> The Emacs Trunk Windows Binaries (bzr revno 106632) have been published in
>
> http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows/
>

When I built Emacs trunk myself, I got this error message:

Loading x:/emacs_files/trunk/bzr/lisp/vc/vc-bzr.el (source)...
Wrong type argument: listp, "fb83b382a2337c79b97761079c878b11"
make[1]: *** [X:/emacs_files/trunk/bzr/lisp/mh-e/mh-loaddefs.el] Error -1
make[1]: Leaving directory `X:/emacs_files/trunk/bzr/lisp'
make: *** [bootstrap-gmake] Error 2

This only happens recently, maybe in one or two weeks.

Did you have the same issue?

Best Regards
cg

Re: emacs-20111206-r106632 Windows Binaries

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: cg <chengang31@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 20:07:02 +0800
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> On 12/7/2011 11:27 AM, Christoph Scholtes wrote:
> > The Emacs Trunk Windows Binaries (bzr revno 106632) have been published in
> >
> > http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows/
> >
> 
> When I built Emacs trunk myself, I got this error message:
> 
> Loading x:/emacs_files/trunk/bzr/lisp/vc/vc-bzr.el (source)...
> Wrong type argument: listp, "fb83b382a2337c79b97761079c878b11"
> make[1]: *** [X:/emacs_files/trunk/bzr/lisp/mh-e/mh-loaddefs.el] Error -1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `X:/emacs_files/trunk/bzr/lisp'
> make: *** [bootstrap-gmake] Error 2

Copy ldefs-boot.el into loaddefs.el, then try again.

> This only happens recently, maybe in one or two weeks.
> 
> Did you have the same issue?

The root cause was fixed by this change:

  2011-11-23  Eli Zaretskii  <eliz@gnu.org>

	  * emacs-lisp/autoload.el (autoload-generate-file-autoloads):
	  On MS-DOS and MS-Windows, compare with loaddefs.el
	  case-insensitively.

But if you have loaddefs.el with SHA1 signatures instead of time
stamps, you must do the copy trick, once.

Re: emacs-20111206-r106632 Windows Binaries

[cg]

On 12/7/2011 9:02 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: cg<chengang31@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 20:07:02 +0800
>> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
>>
>> On 12/7/2011 11:27 AM, Christoph Scholtes wrote:
>>> The Emacs Trunk Windows Binaries (bzr revno 106632) have been published in
>>>
>>> http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows/
>>>
>>
>> When I built Emacs trunk myself, I got this error message:
>>
>> Loading x:/emacs_files/trunk/bzr/lisp/vc/vc-bzr.el (source)...
>> Wrong type argument: listp, "fb83b382a2337c79b97761079c878b11"
>> make[1]: *** [X:/emacs_files/trunk/bzr/lisp/mh-e/mh-loaddefs.el] Error -1
>> make[1]: Leaving directory `X:/emacs_files/trunk/bzr/lisp'
>> make: *** [bootstrap-gmake] Error 2
>
> Copy ldefs-boot.el into loaddefs.el, then try again.
>

I just ran "bzr clean-tree -- unknown --force" once, the build succeeded.

I remember when the error happened, the loaddefs.el only had a few lines,
now it has almost the same as ldefs-boot.el.

It seems gmake can do the copying only in a clean build!?

Thanks,
cg

Re: emacs-20111206-r106632 Windows Binaries

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: cg <chengang31@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 21:25:19 +0800
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> > Copy ldefs-boot.el into loaddefs.el, then try again.
> >
> 
> I just ran "bzr clean-tree -- unknown --force" once, the build succeeded.

Sure, but that does much more, and so is slower.

> I remember when the error happened, the loaddefs.el only had a few lines,
> now it has almost the same as ldefs-boot.el.

loaddefs.el cannot be just a few lines, it's a large file.

> It seems gmake can do the copying only in a clean build!?

Automatically, yes; but you can copy the file manually.

RE: emacs-20111206-r106632 Windows Binaries

[Drew Adams]

December 6 was the last published Windows binary.  Can we look forward to more?
It was really helpful when Sean was publishing them weekly.  Thx.


> From: Christoph Scholtes Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 7:28 PM
> 
> The Emacs Trunk Windows Binaries (bzr revno 106632) have been 
> published in http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows/

Re: emacs-20111206-r106632 Windows Binaries

[Christoph Scholtes]

On 12/31/2011 3:38 PM, Drew Adams wrote:
> December 6 was the last published Windows binary.  Can we look forward to more?
> It was really helpful when Sean was publishing them weekly.  Thx.

Yes. Sorry, I just started a new job and haven't been able to spend a 
lot of time on this.

One thing I am still waiting for is a statement from Chong or Stefan as 
to whether I should build the weekly snapshot from a source tarball and 
upload it too to the ftp site.

Chong, Stefan,
Can you please comment on this? See 
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2011-12/msg00274.html for 
reference.

Thanks,
Christoph

RE: emacs-20111206-r106632 Windows Binaries

[Drew Adams]

Thanks for doing this, Christoph.

> upload it too to the ftp site.

FWIW, I'm looking for an HTTP site for it (not FTP).

Thx - Drew

Re: emacs-20111206-r106632 Windows Binaries

[Christoph Scholtes]

Sorry, forgot to include Stefan and Chong in the thread. See below.

On 12/31/2011 4:14 PM, Christoph Scholtes wrote:

> On 12/31/2011 3:38 PM, Drew Adams wrote:
>> December 6 was the last published Windows binary. Can we look forward
>> to more?
>> It was really helpful when Sean was publishing them weekly. Thx.
>
> Yes. Sorry, I just started a new job and haven't been able to spend a
> lot of time on this.
>
> One thing I am still waiting for is a statement from Chong or Stefan as
> to whether I should build the weekly snapshot from a source tarball and
> upload it too to the ftp site.
>
> Chong, Stefan,
> Can you please comment on this? See
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2011-12/msg00274.html for
> reference.

Re: emacs-20111206-r106632 Windows Binaries

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
> Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 15:19:12 -0800
> Cc: help-emacs-windows@gnu.org, 'Sean Sieger' <sean.sieger@gmail.com>,
> 	'Emacs-Devel devel' <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
> 
> > upload it too to the ftp site.
> 
> FWIW, I'm looking for an HTTP site for it (not FTP).

That FTP site is accessible via HTTP as well.

Re: [h-e-w] emacs-20111206-r106632 Windows Binaries

[Jason Rumney]

"Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:

> Thanks for doing this, Christoph.
>
>> upload it too to the ftp site.
>
> FWIW, I'm looking for an HTTP site for it (not FTP).

The GNU ftp sites are available via http.  Just change the protocol.

RE: emacs-20111206-r106632 Windows Binaries

[Drew Adams]

ping

> From: Christoph Scholtes Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2011 3:14 PM
>
> > December 6 was the last published Windows binary.  Can we 
> > look forward to more?  It was really helpful when Sean was
> > publishing them weekly.  Thx.
> 
> Yes. Sorry, I just started a new job and haven't been able to spend a 
> lot of time on this.
> 
> One thing I am still waiting for is a statement from Chong or 
> Stefan as to whether I should build the weekly snapshot from a
> source tarball and upload it too to the ftp site.
> 
> Chong, Stefan,
> Can you please comment on this? See 
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2011-12/msg00274.html 
> for reference.
> 
> Thanks, Christoph

Windows Binaries

[Drew Adams]

We had Windows builds for 12/06, 1/05, 1/16, and 1/22, plus the 1/30 pretest
build.  None since January.  More, please?


> Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2011 2:39 PM
> Subject: RE: emacs-20111206-r106632 Windows Binaries
> 
> December 6 was the last published Windows binary.  Can we 
> look forward to more? It was really helpful when Sean was
> publishing them weekly.  Thx.

Re: Windows Binaries

[Christoph Scholtes]

On 2/13/2012 8:43 AM, Drew Adams wrote:
> We had Windows builds for 12/06, 1/05, 1/16, and 1/22, plus the 1/30 pretest
> build.  None since January.  More, please?

For some reason my upload last week failed. I didn't have time to figure 
out why. I'll build one in the next couple of days.

RE: [h-e-w] Windows Binaries

[Drew Adams]

> For some reason my upload last week failed. I didn't have 
> time to figure out why. I'll build one in the next couple
> of days.

Thanks, Christoph.

RE: Windows Binaries

[Drew Adams]

There has been no Windows binary posted since the last pretext.  Any chance we
could have an update?  Thx.

Re: Windows Binaries

[Dani Moncayo]

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 19:01, Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> wrote:
> There has been no Windows binary posted since the last pretext.  Any chance we
> could have an update?  Thx.

FWIW: I've just built the latest emacs trunk (revno 107628), and the
binaries are available here:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/41070618/emacs-trunk-r107628-bin-i386.zip

The parameters to configure were:
--without-png --without-jpeg --without-gif --without-tiff
--without-xpm --without-gnutls --enable-checking

Feel free to use it if you want.

-- 
Dani Moncayo

RE: [h-e-w] Windows Binaries

[Drew Adams]

> FWIW: I've just built the latest emacs trunk (revno 107628), and the
> binaries are available here:
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/41070618/emacs-trunk-r107628-bin-i386.zip
> The parameters to configure were:
> --without-png --without-jpeg --without-gif --without-tiff
> --without-xpm --without-gnutls --enable-checking

Thanks, Dani.  I was able to check that bug #11035 was fixed.  But this build is
missing image support, so it's not a general replacement.  Anyway, it certainly
helps to have it.  Thx.

RE: Windows Binaries

[Drew Adams]

> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 11:02 AM
> There has been no Windows binary posted since the last 
> pretext.  Any chance we could have an update?  Thx.

There has been no Windows binary posted since 2012-03-19.
Any chance we could have an update?  Thx.

Re: Windows Binaries

[Christoph Scholtes]

On 4/1/2012 11:28 AM, Drew Adams wrote:
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 11:02 AM
>> There has been no Windows binary posted since the last
>> pretext.  Any chance we could have an update?  Thx.
>
> There has been no Windows binary posted since 2012-03-19.
> Any chance we could have an update?  Thx.

Next release will be the pretest, which is planned for today.

RE: Windows Binaries

[Drew Adams]

> > There has been no Windows binary posted since 2012-03-19.
> > Any chance we could have an update?  Thx.
> 
> Next release will be the pretest, which is planned for today.

Thanks.

RE: [h-e-w] Windows Binaries

[Drew Adams]

The last Windows binary post was 2012-06-18.
Any chance we could have an update?  Thx.

Re: Windows Binaries

[Christoph Scholtes]

My new build server runs weekly builds, but does not retry on a failed 
build. Maybe it should. Last Sunday the build failed because the trunk 
was broken. Next build is scheduled for this Sunday night.

On 6/29/2012 8:45 AM, Drew Adams wrote:
> The last Windows binary post was 2012-06-18.
> Any chance we could have an update?  Thx.

RE: [h-e-w] Windows Binaries

[Drew Adams]

> Next build is scheduled for this Sunday night.

Great.  Thanks, Christoph.