unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
To: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Musings: Supposed places of safety, guaranteed by	parse-partial-sexp are not safe.
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 11:15:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDDEB3A.8020509@gmx.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111205112549.GA3522@acm.acm>

 > The parse-partial scanner works strictly left to right.  If (nth 5 ppss)
 > records the left hand bit of "/*", we are not yet in a comment.  We're
 > probably about to do a division.  Similarly, after * of "*/", we're still
 > in the comment, probably just passed a comment prefix.

If we can look ahead by one character, there is no probability but
certainty.  And the latter is what you want in (nth 4 ppss).  The
remaining case is with an "/" at the end of a buffer and that case
wouldn't trouble me.

 > I disagree.  I think keeping the stricly L to R invariant of the parse is
 > critically important (but don't ask me why :-).

Why would looking ahead violate a L to R rule?

martin



  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-06 10:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-03 23:23 Musings: Supposed places of safety, guaranteed by parse-partial-sexp are not safe Alan Mackenzie
2011-12-03 23:40 ` Daniel Colascione
2011-12-04  3:39 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-12-04 10:41   ` martin rudalics
2011-12-04 15:21     ` Stefan Monnier
2011-12-04 17:06       ` martin rudalics
2011-12-04 20:47         ` Andreas Röhler
2011-12-05  3:33         ` Stefan Monnier
2011-12-05  7:41           ` martin rudalics
2011-12-05 14:01             ` Stefan Monnier
2011-12-05 11:35           ` Alan Mackenzie
2011-12-05 11:25         ` Alan Mackenzie
2011-12-06 10:15           ` martin rudalics [this message]
2011-12-06 10:33             ` Alan Mackenzie
2011-12-06 13:39               ` martin rudalics
2011-12-06 13:50               ` Stefan Monnier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EDDEB3A.8020509@gmx.at \
    --to=rudalics@gmx.at \
    --cc=acm@muc.de \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).