From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Fundamental mode vs. special mode Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 11:19:56 +0200 Message-ID: <4EA3DC3C.70801@gmx.at> References: <86sjmkvl80.fsf@googlemail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1319361613 10517 80.91.229.12 (23 Oct 2011 09:20:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 09:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Christoph Scholtes , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 23 11:20:09 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RHuDt-0001Nu-At for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 11:20:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53005 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RHuDs-0003pP-E7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 05:20:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33419) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RHuDp-0003p6-Ap for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 05:20:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RHuDo-0002Jl-BL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 05:20:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:58563) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RHuDn-0002Jg-Sb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 05:20:00 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2011 09:19:57 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-45-42.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.45.42]) [62.47.45.42] by mail.gmx.net (mp061) with SMTP; 23 Oct 2011 11:19:57 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19koNBQAKtkoMg5msqfoAA1h6i3R7dza3/sGxpXUx mQMerr9SZFU6kA User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 213.165.64.23 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:145430 Archived-At: > Anyway, binding "q" to `quit-window' is no good; IMHO binding "q" to `quit-window' is no good ANYWHERE. I don't ever want to be "special-mode aware" when invoking a command that does not work exclusively in special-mode buffers. martin