From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: window.el modify current emacs23 behavior of anything. Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:23:55 +0400 Message-ID: <4E735BFB.1010307@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1316216806 14936 80.91.229.12 (16 Sep 2011 23:46:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 23:46:46 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 17 01:46:42 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R4i7F-0008Ij-RK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 01:46:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52447 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R4i7F-0004wH-En for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 19:46:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36857) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R4ZKh-0002TS-M1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:24:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R4ZKg-0004R6-Ek for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:23:59 -0400 Original-Received: from forward17.mail.yandex.net ([95.108.253.142]:38027) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R4ZKf-0004Qx-TN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:23:58 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp18.mail.yandex.net (smtp18.mail.yandex.net [95.108.252.18]) by forward17.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 5A67D1062416 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:23:56 +0400 (MSD) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1316183036; bh=NtXBxaBaa5lKBBFRRiTeubvVW7TG4AbG/dVkt1nzQ0c=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=hEOGTTFuAv+dwBx4h93G/+zSmKFBA2ZkrpjoNvT8Se9sFp+3BaOnmRMwqGee1NLUa +u7V0wRLIDyVo7Q6nlY5ZTQl+LoXaiIzA0Vldr5mu7e4Mxpz8klqHItpubLfTJtefF 2u6lXfwTz63gQnx3jSGb6yjGFgDhPmpXFEdsyjM4= Original-Received: from smtp18.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp18.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 3A1CE18A0233 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:23:56 +0400 (MSD) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1316183036; bh=NtXBxaBaa5lKBBFRRiTeubvVW7TG4AbG/dVkt1nzQ0c=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=hEOGTTFuAv+dwBx4h93G/+zSmKFBA2ZkrpjoNvT8Se9sFp+3BaOnmRMwqGee1NLUa +u7V0wRLIDyVo7Q6nlY5ZTQl+LoXaiIzA0Vldr5mu7e4Mxpz8klqHItpubLfTJtefF 2u6lXfwTz63gQnx3jSGb6yjGFgDhPmpXFEdsyjM4= Original-Received: from gutov.static.corbina.ru (gutov.static.corbina.ru [89.179.125.100]) by smtp18.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id NtNeVYYt-NtNmo6wc; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:23:56 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 110916-0, 16.09.2011), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 95.108.253.142 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 19:46:39 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:144076 Archived-At: (Original reporter here) martin rudalics writes: > Hopefully behaves as in emacs23 now. Please try again. I'm still seeing the problem, tested revision 105782. > I tried but couldn't repeat it here. Have you tried the exact scenario I described? If the target point is close enough to the current point, it works for me, too. Regards, Dmitry.