From: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 20:26:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E6E4EC7.8070901@gmx.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83zki9wx4u.fsf@gnu.org>
>> Frames whose names are F1, F2, etc. are terminal frames. Is it
>> possible that the demonic Emacs doesn't delete the initial terminal
>> frame, like an otherwise "normal" interactive session would?
>
> Answering my own question: yes, that's what happens.
Funny. I thought that
When Emacs is
invoked with the `--daemon' option, it does not create any initial
frames, so `initial-window-system' is `nil'.
Does it create a frame afterwards?
> So Martin, I think other_visible_frames should be augmented for the
> fact that when IS_DAEMON is non-zero, there's one frame that is always
> there and does not constitute "other frames".
This would break `delete-frame' which apparently _should_ delete a frame
even if it's the last one in that case. (I think so because nobody ever
complained about this fact.) Is there a way to get IS_DAEMON in Elisp,
`initial-window-system' is deprecated AFAICT.
BTW, the bug should be already present in Emacs 23 when you quit a help
frame or a dedicated frame and that frame is the last visible frame.
martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-12 18:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-10 19:14 Uhm... weird frame behaviour Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-09-10 22:13 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-09-11 9:34 ` martin rudalics
2011-09-11 15:27 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-09-11 15:44 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-09-12 9:04 ` martin rudalics
2011-09-12 9:04 ` martin rudalics
2011-09-12 12:22 ` Óscar Fuentes
2011-09-12 12:47 ` martin rudalics
2011-09-12 13:32 ` Óscar Fuentes
2011-09-12 14:55 ` martin rudalics
2011-09-12 15:34 ` Óscar Fuentes
2011-09-12 16:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-09-12 16:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-09-12 17:16 ` Óscar Fuentes
2011-09-12 17:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-09-12 17:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-09-12 18:26 ` martin rudalics [this message]
2011-09-12 19:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-09-13 11:59 ` martin rudalics
2011-09-12 19:17 ` Chong Yidong
2011-09-13 12:00 ` martin rudalics
2011-09-13 12:45 ` Óscar Fuentes
2011-09-13 18:28 ` martin rudalics
2011-09-14 1:34 ` Óscar Fuentes
2011-09-13 15:41 ` Chong Yidong
2011-09-13 18:27 ` martin rudalics
2011-09-13 19:09 ` Chong Yidong
2011-09-12 12:31 ` Óscar Fuentes
2011-09-12 12:47 ` martin rudalics
2011-09-12 13:32 ` Andy Moreton
2011-09-12 13:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-09-12 16:52 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-09-13 18:28 ` martin rudalics
2011-09-13 20:26 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-09-10 23:40 ` Rasmus
2011-09-10 23:42 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-09-10 23:46 ` Rasmus
2011-09-10 23:53 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-09-11 0:05 ` Óscar Fuentes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E6E4EC7.8070901@gmx.at \
--to=rudalics@gmx.at \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).