From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 11:34:55 +0200 Message-ID: <4E6C80BF.2060002@gmx.at> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1315733710 12743 80.91.229.12 (11 Sep 2011 09:35:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 09:35:10 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 11 11:35:03 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2gRJ-0008SJ-GC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 11:35:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51875 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2gRJ-0007Yd-1y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 05:35:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55221) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2gRH-0007YY-83 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 05:35:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2gRG-0002eN-FE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 05:34:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:60289) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2gRF-0002e9-Vt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 05:34:58 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2011 09:34:56 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-36-94.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.36.94]) [62.47.36.94] by mail.gmx.net (mp045) with SMTP; 11 Sep 2011 11:34:56 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18IQtV+ny8Ipgy1S7gMZV6DALGX6jr5DVKpzn3WN/ vRu/DnIwGvrLJi User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 213.165.64.23 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:143880 Archived-At: > Now I have a reproducible case. If I `q' in the group buffer in Gnus, > the frame is killed. Which function does `q' run? > Can this be explained by any of the recent window code shenanigans? It's probably because the frame in question didn't show another buffer before. Which buffer did you expect it to show after typing `q'? In any case you should be able to turn this behavior off by customizing `window-auto-delete' to nil or 'window. martin