Re: Idea for C-x v u

["Andreas Röhler" <andreas.roehler@online.de>]

Am 27.06.2011 15:06, schrieb Richard Stallman:
> It is definitely a good idea to check the diffs of a file before
> reverting a change, but normally it's a waste of time for C-x v u to
> do that because I will have done it manually.
>
> However, if I ever forget to do that, it wouldn't hurt for C-x v u to
> remind me.

Hi,

think it might pay more to consider the conditions when forgetting occurs.

If it's just to late, a warning might make you still more forgetting.

BTW a feature I most enjoy is abolish warnings when a buffer get's closed.

(defun kill-buffer-unconditional (&optional puffer)
   " "
   (interactive)
   (when puffer
     (set-buffer puffer)
     (switch-to-buffer (current-buffer))
     )
   (set-buffer-modified-p 'nil)
   (kill-buffer (current-buffer)))

Well, sorry, that's again the opposite direction :)

Seriously: usually run two different VC's at same time: RCS in the 
background, committing more often --and without messages-- while above 
bazaar or whatever gets it, when it seems done.



Cheers,

Andreas