From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [display-buffer] a way to make it behave as before? Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:45:26 +0200 Message-ID: <4E01F1F6.2060705@gmx.at> References: <4DFB7705.2000401@gmx.at> <4DFF1223.5030100@gmx.at> <4DFF3BA8.3070007@gmx.at> <4E00C2C8.6040303@gmx.at> <4E0197B3.1080509@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1308751532 28000 80.91.229.12 (22 Jun 2011 14:05:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:05:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Katsumi Yamaoka Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 22 16:05:28 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QZO3b-0003tp-4s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:05:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60184 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QZO3Z-0004Zx-TV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:05:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50226) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QZNkS-0007q5-10 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:45:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QZNkQ-00006o-PB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:45:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:57142) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QZNkQ-00005J-4k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:45:38 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2011 13:45:27 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-41-132.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.41.132]) [62.47.41.132] by mail.gmx.net (mp054) with SMTP; 22 Jun 2011 15:45:27 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+wEXopgp+w4cjKj10YIfKaDQ/EE9Y243R/4gEnsv QM/ZvzkiQeBplk User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 213.165.64.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:140843 Archived-At: > The best choice is to revert all your recent changes, I really, > really believe. I also really believe that you are really > skillful, so I really believe you will bring the new version that > makes everyone happy, within a month. Please consider that those > who use bzr Emacs are not necessarily the Emacs developers. Well this recommendation is not "really" helpful. I've set up a bzr branch more than a year ago and asked people to try it but with the exception of Juanma nobody did. So I have to go through with this by annoying people in order to get some feedback. The only other choice I see is reverting my changes and leave the window code to someone else. martin