From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [display-buffer] a way to make it behave as before? Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:25:55 +0200 Message-ID: <4DFF1223.5030100@gmx.at> References: <4DFB7705.2000401@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1308561999 11502 80.91.229.12 (20 Jun 2011 09:26:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:26:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Katsumi Yamaoka Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 20 11:26:35 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QYaka-00066g-19 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:26:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36999 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QYakZ-0005Af-2g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 05:26:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39592) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QYakC-00059e-PU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 05:26:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QYakA-0008GR-DZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 05:26:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:34096) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QYak9-0008Fw-JQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 05:26:06 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2011 09:26:03 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-53-188.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.53.188]) [62.47.53.188] by mail.gmx.net (mp061) with SMTP; 20 Jun 2011 11:26:03 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+yeG5WRpSyfDCiQh/gBOEb4C4dO8BWdL/nz+HtZY N19HCoFUjVjQ+x User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 213.165.64.23 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:140710 Archived-At: > I only want to see it in the other window of the current frame. There was a misunderstanding. I thought you wanted a new frame :-( In the first version of `display-buffer-alist' there was no minimum size of the new window specified, so you got too many windows. This should have been fixed in the meantime. So the best solution is probably to try using the default value of `display-buffer-alist' again. If you want to avoid that another frame showing the buffer already is used, replace in all reuse-window specifiers you find in `display-buffer-alist' the last element by nil. That is, wherever you see an object like (reuse-window nil same visible) replace the term `visible' by nil (reuse-window nil same nil) so only the selected and not all visible frames get inspected. martin