From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: extra-interactive functions Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:54:43 +0200 Message-ID: <4DE94A13.9080001@gmx.at> References: <87pqngewwp.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <87pqnfu51p.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <87d3jf3ef8.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <87fwobasiy.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87mxi1qlwv.fsf@lifelogs.com> <874o48axbk.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87tyc7i1yw.fsf@lifelogs.com> <4DE8CFA8.5020707@gmx.at> <87vcwneyyl.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <4DE8FD71.1000004@gmx.at> <87boyegajh.fsf@lifelogs.com> <4DE92F11.9010300@gmx.at> <8762omenor.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1307134752 17777 80.91.229.12 (3 Jun 2011 20:59:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 20:59:12 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 03 22:59:09 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QSbSW-0001Z1-0S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:59:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53158 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QSbSV-00010z-5z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:59:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53618) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QSbOL-0000Co-4i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:54:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QSbOJ-0004SF-Kj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:54:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:34513) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QSbOJ-0004S0-1r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:54:47 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Jun 2011 20:54:44 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-36-224.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.36.224]) [62.47.36.224] by mail.gmx.net (mp046) with SMTP; 03 Jun 2011 22:54:44 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18gD+8FAzggO0hSsrLN9VhUL9NYLg3dJPuGs6rJKH BJEJryqegTPfUO User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: <8762omenor.fsf@lifelogs.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 213.165.64.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:140149 Archived-At: > mr> Such functions should be in `byte-compile-interactive-only-functions'. > > Oh cool, so it already exists :) Can the docstring for those functions > automatically include a warning about usage from ELisp? I suppose that anyone adding a function to that list should take care of fixing the doc-string appropriately. > Since you're so > careful about including functions in that list, Am I? > it makes sense to use it > authoritatively. IMHO the warnings are sufficiently annyoing during compilation. Just the authors don't seem very annoyed ;-) martin