From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Adding sha256 and sha512 to C? Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 22:18:17 -0700 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: <4DE1D719.102@cs.ucla.edu> References: <19936.26998.559386.371174@priss.frightenedpiglet.com> <4DE072EE.4030303@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1306646315 30583 80.91.229.12 (29 May 2011 05:18:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 05:18:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 29 07:18:31 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QQYOU-0007Xo-KG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 May 2011 07:18:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51946 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QQYOU-0000PA-6y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 May 2011 01:18:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45965) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QQYOR-0000Ou-Kt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 May 2011 01:18:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QQYOQ-0006WD-LP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 May 2011 01:18:27 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.62]:56284) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QQYOQ-0006W7-EG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 May 2011 01:18:26 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87C92A60003; Sat, 28 May 2011 22:18:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6sDUVs8uGpoX; Sat, 28 May 2011 22:18:23 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.10] (pool-71-189-109-235.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [71.189.109.235]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE9D639E80F0; Sat, 28 May 2011 22:18:23 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 131.179.128.62 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139867 Archived-At: On 05/28/11 21:22, Leo wrote: > I think we should have a consistent signature for all these functions. The idea of changing the signatures for md5 and sha1 got shot down, though, due to backward compatibility concerns. Perhaps we can revisit that idea later, after crypto-hash-function is added. It is a separate issue, and can be treated separately.