From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christoph Scholtes Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A new major-mode for Python Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:21:39 -0600 Message-ID: <4D911803.9040403@gmail.com> References: <4D5C9CF9.6020002@gmail.com> <8639nmnpyh.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301355753 26729 80.91.229.12 (28 Mar 2011 23:42:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:42:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Fabian Ezequiel Gallina Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 29 01:42:29 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4M4q-0000zE-5M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 01:42:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41970 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4LlK-0007Jn-IF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:22:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41591 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4LlE-0007FW-Bt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:22:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4Lkw-0001fc-3D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:21:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yi0-f41.google.com ([209.85.218.41]:45638) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4Lkw-0001fO-0Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:21:54 -0400 Original-Received: by yib18 with SMTP id 18so1389160yib.0 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:21:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Dx88SY2ePv1+zzXFiKqVkPka6Vz/8DQcsvqBpH2Z5Dw=; b=cTpE2fBSOJySlN+nyDlZZlvsxq5w/f42kF9soor896yR3JfMdtrhr7sUhqqfMFw/dc DHlKCOPQfnXz+Zx8w1T7n/eXoJw1z8zp58UbJtJiJj8mYkzmGMIY0+m/hDgztSWbsGPW 8AfaORd1Ox0YWnWitjtPCdZC52h9t+yvCFrSI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=JRdP9UsgyVfEr5ajYheWNzJSkURBBjPHkpzHlS0bmX5gGXLkA4J1lk9c/lkkHpfjlN gkBfr/2vKHKhUf42yMhqX3kVE+tNuQpUKdhzYYjtXdk1PYKVfX9yQhK08D45McDBt1ly CW4Tl+lrz/tuZRrP0LPE0K/4X0zJPBRDROBgU= Original-Received: by 10.150.168.3 with SMTP id q3mr4233691ybe.398.1301354512883; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:21:52 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.5] (71-208-176-211.hlrn.qwest.net [71.208.176.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r18sm5082493yba.11.2011.03.28.16.21.51 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:21:52 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.218.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137821 Archived-At: On 3/28/2011 4:55 PM, Fabian Ezequiel Gallina wrote: > Now I'm kinda lost how we go from here, does everybody agree if I > start creating patches against the trunk version? I have one cleanup patch that I would like to apply to the trunk first. It removes some obsolete stuff that was introduced when the pdbtrack support was added, but never cleaned up. Your patches might apply cleaner after this is removed. I will try to send it later tonight for review. Christoph