From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Delayed warnings Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:06:08 +0100 Message-ID: <4D879390.4050803@gmx.at> References: <4D8705CA.1020300@gmx.at> <4D874FF3.9010606@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300730791 31078 80.91.229.12 (21 Mar 2011 18:06:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:06:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 21 19:06:25 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1jUm-0007YD-Ns for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:06:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36594 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q1jUm-0004Tr-2D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:06:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36658 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q1jUd-0004Mu-86 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:06:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1jUc-00011K-7k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:06:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:50198) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1jUb-00011C-Qe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:06:14 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2011 18:06:11 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-55-101.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.55.101]) [62.47.55.101] by mail.gmx.net (mp037) with SMTP; 21 Mar 2011 19:06:11 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18GEyEGznIGl5gGPewTzC/rU7GfmQVFuuBelZ/+nw Ubfs9paifneuqG User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 213.165.64.23 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137490 Archived-At: > That's different, I think: redisplay errors are the kind that the user > typically cannot do anything useful about. I thought about messages signalling wrong font-lock settings or modeline specifications. ISTR that I found some of them only incidentally when scrolling back my message buffer, probably because they were obscured by some other text (maybe eldoc) displayed in the echo area. martin