From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christoph Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Current state of python.el in the Emacs trunk Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:23:06 -0700 Message-ID: <4D420C6A.2010006@gmail.com> References: <4D40F55C.2040400@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296205512 6101 80.91.229.12 (28 Jan 2011 09:05:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:05:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Christoph , fx@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 28 10:05:08 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PikGN-00018b-Ur for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:05:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38792 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pijac-0007up-0j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 03:21:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50439 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Piii6-0001Yp-MB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 02:25:36 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Piii5-0007z9-Cw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 02:25:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-vw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.212.41]:57088) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Piii5-0007z3-7K; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 02:25:33 -0500 Original-Received: by vws10 with SMTP id 10so1068315vws.0 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 23:25:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0U8tp1jxnBOd76ujO6n8GjcnbxU7Zv+UqwUHKsbhAFc=; b=BHvoMei22GqPBrpgkbYXLYXBXyfDyDYrf0KRareJNgCwHu+0MJeibXtii5Sc87MCqP kLYZ4BVI/XU9jkrzib/eNAQY6CK6lpkRelXeENv1SdMsGzwxY2/fvY7+95m6qY2E0gRI VocnIFpeeEj0vOXeqOy+4HNrh2ISFkMnd6+qg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Tu6AEKqCNf4eTBPjZMapXouVorDhGC9Pgzty4Sjdx3gXJ+66xayXTuukYeNcZ83kpt mA5FQh55zRueajkNlqsD0icdlz8yNEuUxRRGxURbfRaDl1pVCnrA2XwEjACONS9E85r5 FX0DNpza/PmlYzEG9C6+ISwlWce/AdqgWBCOA= Original-Received: by 10.220.186.195 with SMTP id ct3mr422973vcb.57.1296174189991; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:23:09 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.4] (71-208-140-84.hlrn.qwest.net [71.208.140.84]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g17sm10627880vbv.2.2011.01.27.16.23.07 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:23:08 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.212.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:135134 Archived-At: On 1/27/2011 11:35 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote: > AFAIK, the problem is that Dave decided to declare the new changes as > "not covered by his copyright assignment", in other words, expressly > forbidding us to use them. > I'm still not very clear if that's really what happened. OK. I copied him on this thread. Dave, can you shed some light on this? I would appreciate it. Thank you! > If you can help clear the the communication between Dave and us, that > would be wonderful, yes. I will try my best. >> For my own benefit, it would also be nice if it supported alternative >> implementations like IronPython, which right now it does not. > > Patches welcome, Thanks. I will have some patches in a little while. Christoph