From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: grischka Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bikeshedding "user choice" Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 19:18:13 +0100 Message-ID: <4D387C65.1060907@gmx.de> References: CC7464DC3325441081D30E1CB1C67F2C@us.oracle.com <4D375CE1.40003@gmx.de> <901C5B927FE94FCAA55F0033003CF09C@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1295547526 27450 80.91.229.12 (20 Jan 2011 18:18:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:18:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 20 19:18:42 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pfz5k-0000cY-4B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 19:18:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60537 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pfz5j-0006IR-Gk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:18:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41162 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pfz5b-0006DC-9g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:18:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pfz5W-0005Ic-9l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:18:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:50481) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pfz5V-0005IL-Sy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:18:26 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2011 18:18:23 -0000 Original-Received: from 200.106.113.82.net.de.o2.com (EHLO [10.75.21.252]) [82.113.106.200] by mail.gmx.net (mp030) with SMTP; 20 Jan 2011 19:18:23 +0100 X-Authenticated: #18588216 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+IfQw9WqaI/dFXKiadmEF/jZU+KmeaLDvQ8DneEh ZHwU/Jv4Vj993x User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) In-Reply-To: <901C5B927FE94FCAA55F0033003CF09C@us.oracle.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:134828 Archived-At: Drew Adams wrote: >> Also what if some package thinks it wants to bind M-f in some local >> map which I would't really care except that I do care that my menu >> shortcut now stops working? > > Are you saying that you now want to _preclude_ Emacs from creating bindings that > interfere with Windows menu accelerators? Or that interfere with `Alt-f4' or > `Alt-f6' or `Alt-down' or... any other Windows keys...? I was merely asking a question. Just the fact that a feature is maybe in Windows should not stop you to think logically. However as to menu accelerators it would indeed make sense to look for a solution that works also for e.g. GTK or even the built-in text-mode menu. --- grischka > We have not see the last of this...