Re: wrong behaviour of <struct frame>

["Jan Djärv" <jan.h.d@swipnet.se>]

Read the comments:

   /* All Lisp_Object components must come first.
      That ensures they are all aligned normally.  */

and

   /* Beyond here, there should be no more Lisp_Object components.  */

Also see allocate_frame in alloc.c and make_frame in frame.c.

	Jan D.


alin soare skrev 2010-12-02 09.54:
> I defined within the struct frame an integer variable
>
> int ct;
>
> If I define it immediately after the menu_bar_vector, it is initialized
> somewhere with the pointer value of Qnil. (&Qnil)
>
>        Only the X toolkit version uses this.  */
>
>     Lisp_Object menu_bar_vector;
> +
> +    int ct;
>
>
> In this case, if I change the value f->ct, emacs crashes with segmentation
> fault, generated by the garbage collector. Why , as time as I initialize a
> variable defined by myself ?
>
>
> -----------------------------------------
>
> If I define it at the end of struct frame, id est immediately after the
> fieldforeground_pixel,
>
> /* All display backends seem to need these two pixel values. */
>    unsigned long background_pixel;
>    unsigned long foreground_pixel;
> +
> +    int ct;
> }
>
> everything works fine in that case.
>
> I wish to ask you to suggest me if you can, what happens when I define the var.
> 'ct' inside the struct frame.
>
>
>
> Alin.
>
>
>