From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBSw7ZobGVy?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Orgmode] Difference between org-footnote.el and footnote.el Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:21:20 +0200 Message-ID: <4CC084A0.5090308@online.de> References: <87tykgxqbb.fsf@fastmail.fm> <878w1s7zw8.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <871v7k7ydt.fsf_-_@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <4CC00391.6050608@easy-emacs.de> <87wrpb7unc.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <15036.1287673547@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <4CC078A6.7060309@online.de> <878w1r5t7k.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1287685928 30463 80.91.229.12 (21 Oct 2010 18:32:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:32:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Nick Dokos , Carsten Dominik , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 21 20:32:06 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P8zvp-0003go-AY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:32:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48637 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8zqN-0006YT-50 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:26:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40402 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8zmV-0003yN-8M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:22:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8zmN-0000bw-QF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:22:25 -0400 Original-Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:64912) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8zmN-0000bj-Cs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:22:19 -0400 Original-Received: from noname.home (brln-4dbc643a.pool.mediaWays.net [77.188.100.58]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MWPgw-1P7TbD32dO-00X5ZU; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:22:14 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6 In-Reply-To: <878w1r5t7k.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:snQKJ1H5sTlzS2XWZa/apAoLkcl1WXl5siYY9Wc3OLf OtrudsE4vtwkdBG4aoic7y+daWtA3HpFhEgEWB6CsAK5mDKVs+ 9Oy4ptq5CcBuuIWcY+CP1ooFJeLqNkQdhWiHFqqoI0lQwL13Wz Z+iL0CN3/UxpfdA3Nv20uSObLSjaLr50Znnsp0l/j/72Qfouai DL7OTgPuLsXvwBHXT/aUnJTf31yzXZZ/wCG1iommYU= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:131944 Archived-At: Am 21.10.2010 19:52, schrieb Tassilo Horn: > Andreas Röhler writes: > > Hi Andreas, > >> Keeping things easy, it seems preferable to have a working common >> footnote first and reflect the use in mails resp. signature issue >> afterwards. > > I don't get it. The "common" footnote.el works great with email and > signatures, but doesn't recognize existing footnotes when revisiting a > file. org-footnote.el doesn't (yet) handle signatures in mails and > requires some macros and compatibility functions from org, but it > recognizes existing footnotes. > > Bye, > Tassilo > Hi Tassilo, thanks, missed that aspect. Andreas