From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christoph Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C-d deleting region considered harmful Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 13:45:22 -0600 Message-ID: <4C9516D2.2050609@gmail.com> References: <87eicrx1ls.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <83lj6zz9o0.fsf@gnu.org> <87fwx78jwq.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <83fwx7z7qn.fsf@gnu.org> <83d3sbz7b8.fsf@gnu.org> <871v8rdzug.fsf@gmx.de> <4C94E566.7020701@gmail.com> <83y6azxbuv.fsf@gnu.org> <4C94E7F4.6080101@gmail.com> <87sk16dekw.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284839140 14928 80.91.229.12 (18 Sep 2010 19:45:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 19:45:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Sebastian Rose Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 18 21:45:39 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ox3Lu-0004Ke-9j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 21:45:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50686 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ox3Lt-0001oo-M4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 15:45:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58907 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ox3Lo-0001oE-9M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 15:45:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ox3Ln-0004DP-9j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 15:45:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.160.169]:43537) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ox3Ln-0004DJ-2x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 15:45:31 -0400 Original-Received: by gyf3 with SMTP id 3so1617889gyf.0 for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 12:45:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bMYe+ElEKgQlGsgDsIR7SujIO6Upx851akLU3dvhx3A=; b=bTP3MZFzIfS7SP59b+lz4Kq1btfRQssOa+3OV06JTasV/D0/e2D6v9roSDmVDD1wgC 7larhIKvCTWf0qBaHZ3Spzo8Zsxdy6qmgi23u23yCYc51uoVQsd7AmcIqwBJGa8iztQe XAyBA+TAXbiX6L715N22p37lXRy2q2capZ+Ns= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DrphaxAY8ockD4QaXLxCfSnGWcrGAtWF5ZH+BpG5e4N0/StMntQkgkkwKoiOB/BiFa nhUvkughO/QuH0XVn6LJUZj5xKJZT6XMk7J61TEl18sYXbjOu6zrwV7WCAb2GZ8OfHKO 3osQry6Ytutq9fBJzLDFuAYoJK/qcpRBMO4WU= Original-Received: by 10.150.216.21 with SMTP id o21mr7207339ybg.309.1284839130342; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 12:45:30 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.4] (97-122-97-123.hlrn.qwest.net [97.122.97.123]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q21sm6568817ybk.11.2010.09.18.12.45.24 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 18 Sep 2010 12:45:29 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100825 Thunderbird/3.1.3 In-Reply-To: <87sk16dekw.fsf@gmx.de> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130448 Archived-At: On 9/18/2010 1:41 PM, Sebastian Rose wrote: > You could (re-)bind keys to make something "simple" like deleting a > whole bunch of text for good the default for you. Why wouldn't something simple like that be available with a simple key combination out of the box? > The current situation is, we have to rebind more and more keys to do > something reasonable in many, many cases. That's worse. I don't understand what you mean. Christoph