From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: chad Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cl-defstruct-based package.el, now with ert tests! Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:53:03 -0700 Message-ID: <4C84718E-DBD9-44E4-85C5-4D2E9C112C95@mit.edu> References: <87mwu9l6ju.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87obeog70m.fsf@yandex.ru> <87ip4wpjtw.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1363283606 4233 80.91.229.3 (14 Mar 2013 17:53:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:53:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Daniel Hackney To: "emacs-devel@gnu.org Development" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 14 18:53:51 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UGCLe-0008Eo-V2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:53:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52645 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGCLI-0006N6-DE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:53:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53588) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGCL9-0006Hy-4E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:53:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGCL4-0003J5-EO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:53:19 -0400 Original-Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-2.mit.edu ([18.9.25.13]:44176) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGCL4-0003Ip-Bc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:53:14 -0400 X-AuditID: 1209190d-b7fa66d0000008f6-11-51420e88a33d Original-Received: from mailhub-auth-4.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.39]) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-2.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 83.57.02294.88E02415; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:53:12 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-4.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id r2EHrBoE023277; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:53:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [10.0.1.10] (c-98-247-148-125.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [98.247.148.125]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as yandros@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id r2EHr6Q8029128 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:53:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrGIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixG6nrtvB5xRoMG+TgUXj/AXsFo8XPGF1 YPJom2bmcf/tB5YApigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujGMz9rMXzGet+NxymK2BcQZLFyMnh4SAicTs 5UuYIGwxiQv31rN1MXJxCAnsY5RobFzFBOFsZJRY33yPEaRKSOA4k8Tt/8wgNrOAlsSNfy/B unkF9CQOd25nBbGFBewlXvUdBZrEwcEmIAM0VQMkzAm07FXHdLByFgFViSW3NjKClDALKEvs uyUFMVFbYtnC18wQE60k7rQvY4E44R+jxKLrS8ASIgLWEjtWf4U6WlZixdRepgmMgrOQXDQL yUWzkMxdwMi8ilE2JbdKNzcxM6c4NVm3ODkxLy+1SNdILzezRC81pXQTIyh4OSV5dzC+O6h0 iFGAg1GJh9fhoWOgEGtiWXFl7iFGSQ4mJVHeJm6nQCG+pPyUyozE4oz4otKc1OJDjBIczEoi vLv+ApXzpiRWVqUW5cOkpDlYlMR5r6Tc9BcSSE8sSc1OTS1ILYLJynBwKEnwOvICDRUsSk1P rUjLzClBSDNxcIIM5wEaXg9Sw1tckJhbnJkOkT/FqCglzisGkhAASWSU5sH1wpLLK0ZxoFeE eVtBqniAiQmu+xXQYCagwek59iCDSxIRUlINjKz5Pvu3Hz6waYLhQ55LGocSDk3escBtkex7 44T8qpSZ0yQZnpy51Rss6CTvad3x3cRLsunVtCfNFjumeBxLPOw/RTjB18t7q9FW01fOYYxp lueMpZ46xE+6ohYjt63wfPmBW4Xq74XmZs/6oHrp29Wou1f+zYpcqSxqu4RXaF/O X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 18.9.25.13 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:157863 Archived-At: On 14 Mar 2013, at 06:49, Stefan Monnier = wrote: >> was fine. If people really don't want to depend on the external = program, I'll >> remove it and just use `tar-mode'. >=20 > On GNU/Linux, Mac OS X, Cygwin, ..., there's very little risk in > assuming that `tar' is available. > But IIUC under Windows the picture is completely different. Does the Windows-side picture get any better for zip instead of tar or tar+gunzip? When I last had to care, the variations in unzip on Windows were pretty annoying, but in those days Windows 95 was common and NT 3.51 was `a good sign'. Hopefully, the situation has improved. ~Chad=