From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?SmFuIERqw6Rydg==?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Get rid of cut buffer code, any objections? Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:47:23 +0200 Message-ID: <4C7B45EB.20901@swipnet.se> References: <4C7A97E8.9090707@swipnet.se> <87sk1xkxdf.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283147259 15404 80.91.229.12 (30 Aug 2010 05:47:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 05:47:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 30 07:47:38 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OpxDW-0002E5-4v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:47:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54174 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OpxDU-0008TE-W1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 01:47:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53533 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OpxDL-0008Sj-Ew for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 01:47:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OpxDK-0000Xu-61 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 01:47:27 -0400 Original-Received: from smtprelay-h21.telenor.se ([195.54.99.196]:58959) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OpxDJ-0000Xn-Uk; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 01:47:26 -0400 Original-Received: from ipb1.telenor.se (ipb1.telenor.se [195.54.127.164]) by smtprelay-h21.telenor.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B84BC477; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:47:24 +0200 (CEST) X-SENDER-IP: [85.225.45.35] X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao00ACvjekxV4S0jPGdsb2JhbACDFoRSmF4MAQEBATUtqEGRBIEigyJzBA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.56,290,1280700000"; d="scan'208";a="124737615" Original-Received: from c-232de155.25-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO coolsville.localdomain) ([85.225.45.35]) by ipb1.telenor.se with ESMTP; 30 Aug 2010 07:47:24 +0200 Original-Received: from [172.20.199.13] (zeplin [172.20.199.13]) by coolsville.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9856C7FA05A; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:47:23 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; sv-SE; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 In-Reply-To: <87sk1xkxdf.fsf@catnip.gol.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:129412 Archived-At: Miles Bader skrev 2010-08-29 21.54: > Jan Dj=C3=A4rv writes: >> I have started to remove cut-buffer support for X11 (nothing checked i= n >> sofar). Are there any objections? > > nope, but man, googling for "x11 cut buffers" dragged up an old netnews > post with jwz going wild with the term 'FSFmacs"... :O > "Cut Buffers: Obsolete. Never, ever, ever use them. Ever." Jan D.