From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?SmFuIERqw6Rydg==?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs and Gnome Canvas Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:16:31 +0200 Message-ID: <4C3F264F.2030501@swipnet.se> References: <4C3CD120.4040905@swipnet.se> <5A91499A-0470-43FD-9F48-560CEAD3424C@mit.edu> <83wrsyr068.fsf@gnu.org> <83iq4hhjww.fsf@gnu.org> <87sk3lbvv0.fsf@telefonica.net> <83hbk1grnq.fsf@gnu.org> <4C3EBCDC.8050709@swipnet.se> <83d3upgmwj.fsf@gnu.org> <4C3ECB4C.6050208@swipnet.se> <83aaptgly1.fsf@gnu.org> <4C3ED4F9.4080603@swipnet.se> <83630hgi0r.fsf@gnu.org> <4C3EE8D6.3020607@swipnet.se> <8339vlgcax.fsf@gnu.org> <4C3F1A1B.1040106@swipnet.se> <83wrswg6e4.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1279207446 11160 80.91.229.12 (15 Jul 2010 15:24:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:24:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 15 17:24:04 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OZQI7-0001zc-7c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:24:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52284 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OZQI6-0001bY-R0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36478 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OZQHS-0000gz-TM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:23:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OZQAw-0003YE-AK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:16:39 -0400 Original-Received: from smtprelay-h21.telenor.se ([195.54.99.196]:37342) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OZQAt-0003Xj-6G; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:16:35 -0400 Original-Received: from ipb3.telenor.se (ipb3.telenor.se [195.54.127.166]) by smtprelay-h21.telenor.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C804EA127; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:16:33 +0200 (CEST) X-SENDER-IP: [85.225.45.35] X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtY8AEvDPkxV4S0jPGdsb2JhbACDH4RSl3EMAQEBATUtrRGRVYEpgwlyBA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.55,209,1278280800"; d="scan'208";a="548155250" Original-Received: from c-232de155.25-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO coolsville.localdomain) ([85.225.45.35]) by ipb3.telenor.se with ESMTP; 15 Jul 2010 17:16:32 +0200 Original-Received: from [172.20.199.2] (gaffa [172.20.199.2]) by coolsville.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 264417FA05A; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:16:31 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100423 Thunderbird/3.0.4 In-Reply-To: <83wrswg6e4.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:127360 Archived-At: 2010-07-15 16:35, Eli Zaretskii skrev: >> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:24:27 +0200 >> From: Jan Dj=C3=A4rv >> Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> No, they need to be done anyway sometime, it is no waste. If the text= isn't >> displayed, the attributes are nvertheless set up correctly for the tim= e when >> the text is to be displayed later (by scrolling for example). > > By which time those attributes could have recomputed many times, for > just one display! > That may be so. But there is nothing actually displayed, you just do a u= pdate=20 of the attributes. I'm sure one could hook in to the scroll bars and jus= t=20 update the visible portion if that is needed. >> If done right, I don't think it would be slower. But someone has to d= o the >> code before we know. > > Well, naturally, if "done right"s definition is "to be no slower" ;-) > Isn't that always implied by "right"? Jan D.