From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Frame ordering Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:20:25 +0200 Message-ID: <4C15F459.8070506@gmx.at> References: <8F18E079-3351-4398-B76B-6CF9169ACE9E@gmail.com> <4C123889.5060801@gmx.at> <597D28BE-ABE3-4FFF-84B1-1FBF9931293C@gmail.com> <4C126EA5.1050509@gmx.at> <4DF4317D-522E-4948-9C19-ED1252BF36B2@gmail.com> <4C133EDF.8070407@gmx.at> <77C00490-801D-47B9-83BC-32D786F1F684@gmail.com> <1F24A2FE-EF86-4E03-84CF-69748A482C64@gmail.com> <4C15D150.6040006@gmx.at> <4C15E738.10204@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276507386 30613 80.91.229.12 (14 Jun 2010 09:23:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:23:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: David Reitter , Stefan Monnier , Emacs-Devel devel To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 14 11:23:05 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OO5sR-0003HL-NO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:23:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37151 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OO5s5-0007tW-Tq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 05:22:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33867 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OO5rm-0007GU-NX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 05:22:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OO5qK-0003VE-TJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 05:20:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:37462) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OO5qK-0003Ur-Gw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2010 05:20:32 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2010 09:20:30 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-63-155.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.63.155]) [62.47.63.155] by mail.gmx.net (mp038) with SMTP; 14 Jun 2010 11:20:30 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/kZxVIVfbk405s0ikqPT7tHdcjk5WUqvMJMPGAaM +w8A/pWP/TSOo9 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125898 Archived-At: >> #ifdef NS_IMPL_COCOA >> else >> /* Under NS, there is no system mechanism for choosing a new >> window to get focus -- it is left to application code. >> So the portion of THIS application interfacing with NS >> needs to know about it. We call Fraise_frame, but the >> purpose is really to transfer focus. */ >> Fraise_frame (frame1); >> #endif > >> before we do switch frames. Is this related to the issue at hand? > > I think so. That's why I referred to > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2009-05/msg00373.html > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2009-05/msg00413.html > > in my previous mail ("the updated comment" in the latter means the > above comment). What's not clear to me is: Does (1) the conditional above (raising the frame) not transfer the focus or is (2) just the comment wrong and the raise_frame is not needed? martin