From: grischka <grishka@gmx.de>
To: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
Cc: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@xemacs.org>,
emacs-devel@gnu.org, Jason Rumney <jasonr@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: System calls without error checks in w32
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 20:54:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C0D4078.1030208@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikOEPSDRgorCDnRobwDt2FGvAjapjeC-h0s-_i7@mail.gmail.com>
Lennart Borgman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 7:21 PM, grischka <grishka@gmx.de> wrote:
>> Lennart Borgman wrote:
>>> I guess the idea of having two event loops/thread is not in itself
>>> bad. If the gui thread is never blocked it can be used to convey
>>> status information at least to the user. (You can put these in
>>> temporary windows inside the frame for example.)
>
>> Since this is Emacs you'd probably want to format your status info
>> in Lisp. Bye nice idea and welcome to thread hell.
>
> I see no reason to format it in Lisp. Or rather my idea is that the
> status information is formated by the lisp thread in advance and sent
> to the gui thread in a non-lisp format. Then the gui thread can offer
> that information without contactinog the lisp thread.
But then what is the benefit from that additional effort of preparing
and sending a "non-lisp" representation forth and back, except to satisfy
the requirements of having two threads? Have only one thread and you
can format and display the info in one go. Simple, reliable, conclusive.
--- grischka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-07 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-31 9:18 System calls without error checks in w32 grischka
2010-06-05 17:15 ` Jason Rumney
2010-06-07 10:37 ` grischka
2010-06-07 14:54 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-06-07 15:23 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-06-07 17:21 ` grischka
2010-06-07 17:30 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-06-07 18:54 ` grischka [this message]
2010-06-08 0:32 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-06-08 0:34 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-06-07 19:56 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-06-07 23:35 ` Lennart Borgman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-05-29 2:38 Lennart Borgman
2010-05-29 17:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-05-29 18:42 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-05-29 19:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-05-29 20:02 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-05-29 21:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-05-29 21:30 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-05-30 3:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-05-30 3:26 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-05-30 17:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-05-30 18:02 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-05-30 19:24 ` Juanma Barranquero
2010-05-30 22:37 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-05-30 23:03 ` Juanma Barranquero
2010-05-30 23:28 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-05-31 0:10 ` Juanma Barranquero
2010-05-31 0:58 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-05-31 2:02 ` Juanma Barranquero
2010-05-31 2:36 ` Lennart Borgman
2010-05-31 3:06 ` Juanma Barranquero
2010-05-31 3:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C0D4078.1030208@gmx.de \
--to=grishka@gmx.de \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=jasonr@gnu.org \
--cc=lennart.borgman@gmail.com \
--cc=stephen@xemacs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).