From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Jan D." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New Lucid menus Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:34:26 +0200 Message-ID: <4BC81302.1090600@swipnet.se> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1271407470 23569 80.91.229.12 (16 Apr 2010 08:44:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 08:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 16 10:44:27 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2hA3-0006mW-7t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:44:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37148 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O2hA1-0004OU-LE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 04:44:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O2h9W-0004GR-8Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 04:43:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54565 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O2h9J-0005FU-B5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 04:43:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2g4Q-0000ZZ-Ir for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 03:37:47 -0400 Original-Received: from smtprelay-h11.telenor.se ([62.127.194.4]:47452) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2g4Q-0000Yx-87 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 03:34:34 -0400 Original-Received: from ipb2.telenor.se (ipb2.telenor.se [195.54.127.165]) by smtprelay-h11.telenor.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id F4078C1BD for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:34:32 +0200 (CEST) X-SENDER-IP: [85.225.45.110] X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmdEAE6vx0tV4S1uPGdsb2JhbACHZpQKDAEBAQE1Lb4uhQ4E X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,218,1270418400"; d="scan'208";a="64230976" Original-Received: from c-6e2de155.25-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO coolsville.localdomain) ([85.225.45.110]) by ipb2.telenor.se with ESMTP; 16 Apr 2010 09:34:31 +0200 Original-Received: from [192.168.77.62] (ns1.operax.com [213.88.244.216]) by coolsville.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CBA4B7FA01A; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:34:30 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:123747 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: > I really like the antialiased fonts in the Lucid menus, but the code > still has some problems: > - emacs -Q followed by C-mouse-3 gets us straight to a segfault because > of a "childs[0] = 0;" where childs has just been initialised to NULL. > But even after removing this assignment I still get some assertion > failure: > > % emacs -Q > C-down-mouse-2 > ...move mouse down through the menu (making the submenus show up) and > then back up to just above the menu title... > ...release the mouse-2 button outside the menu > > I then get an assertion failure at insdel.c:2046 because > "XWINDOW (selected_window)->buffer" doesn't hold a buffer apparently :-( Hmm, that sounds strange. I thought selected window always had a buffer. > > - when I move the mouse through the menubar's submenus, they flicker like > crazy: they seem to be constantly redrawn. > That I don't see, but maybe my machine is faster? I'll check it out. BTW, shouldn't this be a bug report :-) Jan D.