From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christoph Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Next pretest Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:25:10 -0600 Message-ID: <4BC7CA86.4060308@gmail.com> References: <87mxx7s743.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <871vegpm0s.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1271385518 30617 80.91.229.12 (16 Apr 2010 02:38:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 02:38:38 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 16 04:38:37 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2bS1-0003kC-C1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 04:38:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54421 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O2bS0-0006CT-NG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:38:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O2bQr-0005Mw-HF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:37:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39675 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O2bQp-0004yc-I0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:37:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2bF6-0004tg-4c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:25:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pz0-f198.google.com ([209.85.222.198]:55170) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2bF5-0004tZ-Sw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:25:16 -0400 Original-Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so1818706pzk.24 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:25:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZNGPwBPUjb9fdKIV3Ak/rWKplTiKywmO+hVQBA5h3DI=; b=rlmmfpjqO51iDG8B6C7rKhlU+nboXjKBLLTLJg+J5vnwD/DmSz08lRMjWWxbqh5ayo leLuitorlfJGueSCfA1XSEZ93xjk2HHssA0ZbctSUlQjYvyjTsSdoyA+M50Hd1Cau1rf EuS1VlEId5Ry/B+MB1RDymtxs6OvqH81Do2uE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=v8ez6YoJ9y62R7IhL27yEB/w5QP9EaZoyBdWJUEo7MFP72bnrPqPF8UVOD4V7anpDX XtkKAnDc8ZRe3azc9yEkydBdusS+pmQZxA5MmQKFKvuhlMSyyhU9lG2tztEBMlXmlkTM 8NS5dlmtqkV3v8vYbtCY9+UtEn0ARihPi2D8c= Original-Received: by 10.143.153.28 with SMTP id f28mr610123wfo.330.1271384713808; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:25:13 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (67-41-201-226.hlrn.qwest.net [67.41.201.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm1817781pzk.15.2010.04.15.19.25.11 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:25:12 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 In-Reply-To: <871vegpm0s.fsf@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:123743 Archived-At: On 4/15/2010 1:13 PM, Sean Sieger wrote: > Sorry about broaching this at the eleventh hour---does anyone find it > curious that after I did a MS Windows build, [...] > that the info files, as Drew immediately pointed out, were mysteriously > absent? > Yes, very curious indeed. Have you tried reproducing this by building from a fresh tarball?