From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Zhu, Shenli" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bad default faces now Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:21:04 +0800 Message-ID: <4BA70C50.5020105@gmail.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269238887 18261 80.91.229.12 (22 Mar 2010 06:21:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:21:27 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 22 07:21:24 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ntb0t-0000Ry-7a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:21:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41351 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ntb0r-0000UQ-Ot for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:21:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ntb0l-0000UH-Pg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:21:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56592 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ntb0j-0000Tw-Hs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:21:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ntb0i-0002hf-JR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:21:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com ([209.85.210.172]:38446) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ntb0i-0002hX-GM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:21:12 -0400 Original-Received: by yxe2 with SMTP id 2so3160272yxe.14 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:21:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zLJ5G28St/p2ciMbuUWPyKFNK0vc6aqVND2LeUMiUb4=; b=w6Wg1pIo+YnuiedH4kf26Fvqs8SADVK9tw7NswDIcP29ShfZrv63H2ehMr70iP7FnP zjTBVX5RqMSXRCPqiRS+3hiVeA/FVExQIpLHdZzDtR9NELxPK7OafDOGqKN4JhoemvrU azA5Yk0UtHiPgaH3grFtlPGnpGcSR9+/DsAv0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Pa6JdNV6h1MVAyzvc2zvQrH/dFQgkmgJVhTCHeIzg1oyKUtsqdSmgVnHC1Nkfxo61V /zocQkgz3CvnVDvcQvT1leyjRDg/cNtlZrF5c0Z3htVNWsy85ZxZabTKwD9bhkVzL5t/ 7WpLqb8ZTSnSPqRDf+vDS+bez/5mOAoV0QXQA= Original-Received: by 10.100.22.32 with SMTP id 32mr8119367anv.153.1269238871235; Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:21:11 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [116.232.80.114] ([116.232.80.114]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 8sm376628yxg.13.2010.03.21.23.21.08 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:21:10 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122451 Archived-At: On 03/22/2010 01:28 PM, Drew Adams wrote: > The default faces were changed after Emacs 23.1, and the result is worse, IMO. > > I don't care for myself, since I don't use the default faces, but see the > attached screenshot. The faces for the comment, the variable name, and the doc > string are all about the same. > > In GNU Emacs 23.1.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) > of 2009-07-29 on SOFT-MJASON > Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 > configured using `configure --with-gcc (4.4)' > I think the new face in 23.1 is very clear, at least better than default face in 22.x. Can you attach the face you use for comparison? Thanks, Shenli