From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christoph Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Review: make-tarball.txt Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:32:19 -0700 Message-ID: <4B85EF43.3070002@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267070776 31046 80.91.229.12 (25 Feb 2010 04:06:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 04:06:16 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 25 05:06:10 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkUzH-0000bV-6R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 05:06:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51983 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NkUzG-00065E-Op for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:06:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NkUSi-00062g-Am for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:32:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58100 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NkUSf-00062Y-PM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:32:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkUSf-00009a-I6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:32:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:39687) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkUSf-00009U-CK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:32:25 -0500 Original-Received: by pwj7 with SMTP id 7so5504155pwj.0 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:32:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=oRHla6R7d5frbYwtJAt06hCYQ6dZbQ12oFvYNwb311U=; b=CAvlZlShC1ATnqg6XvIZygiDYz2UlaD6lGIVRmy92XUTN3O6UKVwDJedgqMpO9NXXc 3CWR0c2zRrJ/Obdot+3GV/ScmJD6iWz2widMXqhmcqnA1V1/0Bv2FQlyBprCMzniXHO7 7PU5GxPvbPj6O26I5RV5sRvNYPJwLT44VSIw4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ih58eSw43/wzgBg+pqFzGtyxaYt85WsX5fFWbp3zeIPNiupTBxbw1AnM0Cb7Fpfts/ oZRGmg39YtML6+NQTVeGQOY6kXqVwzNNQ3mJmhqyQFMCJh2OgqfDkeAUGXyK6vRDAFe7 vzXTj7ZM29UxAFH8jILTG0cfpRjJXi0avEOz0= Original-Received: by 10.143.27.17 with SMTP id e17mr313948wfj.221.1267068742883; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:32:22 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from ?192.168.1.4? (67-41-204-234.hlrn.qwest.net [67.41.204.234]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm1508226pzk.12.2010.02.24.19.32.21 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:32:22 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:05:08 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121353 Archived-At: Hi, I saw that make-tarball.txt in the admin directory was still referring to CSV in the instructions. I would like to propose the following changes: === modified file 'admin/make-tarball.txt' --- admin/make-tarball.txt 2010-01-04 05:35:18 +0000 +++ admin/make-tarball.txt 2010-02-25 02:57:10 +0000 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ For each step, check for possible errors. -1. cvs -q update -Pd +1. bzr update 2. Bootstrap to make 100% sure all elc files are up-to-date, and to make sure that the later tagged version will bootstrap, should it be @@ -56,23 +56,26 @@ number of the old Emacs to __, do the same with the new log and do M-x ediff. Especially check that Info files aren't built. -10. cd EMACS_ROOT_DIR; cvs tag TAG +10. cd EMACS_ROOT_DIR/trunk + bzr tag TAG TAG is EMACS_PRETEST_XX_YY_ZZZ for a pretest, EMACS_XX_YY for a release. Shortly before the release, cut the branch with the following commands: - cvs rtag EMACS_`NUMBER'_BASE - cvs rtag -b EMACS_`NUMBER'_RC -r EMACS_`NUMBER'_BASE - + bzr tag EMACS_`NUMBER'_BASE + bzr branch -r tag:EMACS_`NUMBER'_BASE ./ ../EMACS_`NUMBER'_RC + where `NUMBER' is the major version number of the release. This makes it easier to see what changes have been applied to the branch with: - cvs diff -r EMACS_`NUMBER'_BASE -r EMACS_`NUMBER'_RC + bzr diff -r tag:EMACS_`NUMBER'_BASE - or merge changes back to the trunk with "cvs update -j", if - necessary. + or merge changes back to the trunk with + + cd EMACS_ROOT_DIR/trunk + bzr merge ../EMACS_`NUMBER'_RC After doing this, increase the version number on the trunk as per step 4. Any feedback is appreciated. Christoph