From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David De La Harpe Golden Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr protocol? Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:00:25 +0000 Message-ID: <4B800719.6050000@harpegolden.net> References: <20100219.071808.112831897.wl@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1266803678 18577 80.91.229.12 (22 Feb 2010 01:54:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 01:54:38 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs developers Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 20 17:01:16 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nirl2-0000v9-3W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 17:00:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57271 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nirl1-0005x0-J9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:00:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nirkv-0005vl-Dt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:00:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43023 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nirku-0005v3-AL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:00:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nirkr-0004zW-TQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:00:32 -0500 Original-Received: from harpegolden.net ([65.99.215.13]:37182) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nirkr-0004zA-QF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:00:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [87.198.55.158] (87-198-55-158.ptr.magnet.ie [87.198.55.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "David De La Harpe Golden", Issuer "David De La Harpe Golden Personal CA rev 3" (verified OK)) by harpegolden.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97CEB8D9F for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:00:27 +0000 (GMT) User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20091109) In-Reply-To: <20100219.071808.112831897.wl@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121251 Archived-At: Werner LEMBERG wrote: > Is there any progress in adding the bzr protocol to Savannah to make > pulling quicker and consuming less bandwidth? > > > Werner > > FWIW, I've taken to doing the following in the (possibly mistaken) hope it speeds things up a bit: 1. setup a bzr shared repo 2. pull lp:emacs into branch "lptrunk" in it. 3. pull savannah emacs into branch trunk in it. When updating, pull 2 then 3, to minimise amount to grab from savannah. - launchpad emacs mirror is "genetically related" to savannah (pulled from it) and is much faster than savannah (still feels kinda slow, but hey I use git at work...), and only a few hours behind at most afaik. Or maybe I'm imagining that it's any better at all, I haven't really looked into how smart bzr is about these things or done benchmarks.